sdk-container-builds
krustlet
sdk-container-builds | krustlet | |
---|---|---|
7 | 21 | |
170 | 3,531 | |
1.2% | 0.2% | |
4.8 | 3.1 | |
6 days ago | 7 months ago | |
C# | Rust | |
MIT License | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
sdk-container-builds
-
.NET 8 Standalone 50% Smaller On Linux
You can also publish .NET apps/services directly as container images [1].
Or you can distribute them as a single file, standalone, "ready to run" application, which precompiles your methods and includes the JIT. This results in a larger executable, but keeps all the functionality, including reflection and runtime code generation, intact.
And, of course, you can install .NET core directly on your Linux system, just as you would for Python or Ruby (where you also don't usually rely on the default installation).
[1] https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/docker/publish...
-
Secure your .NET cloud apps with rootless Linux Containers
If you're using the https://github.com/dotnet/sdk-container-builds tech to build containers, we're working on a 0.4 version of that package that applies this rootless user by default - the goal is that the SDK tooling is the smoothest, least-effort pathway to secure, correct, best-practice containers for all .NET applications!
-
Dockerize .NET Applications without Dockerfile! - Built-In Container Support for .NET 7
Alternatively, here's Microsoft's own documentation about how to do all of the above: https://github.com/dotnet/sdk-container-builds/blob/main/docs/GettingStarted.md
-
Crafting container images without Dockerfiles
We've been baking this functionality directly into the .NET SDK for a couple releases now: https://github.com/dotnet/sdk-container-builds
It's really nice to derive mostly-complete container images from information your build system already has available, and the speed/UX benefits are great too!
-
Announcing built-in container support for the .NET SDK
Funny you should mention scaffolding out a Dockerfile - internally we'd been talking about that as a bridge to other services that are highly Dockerfile-based. I just logged https://github.com/dotnet/sdk-container-builds/issues/146 to track this request. We likely won't prioritize it for the 7.0 release unless we get huge amounts of feedback that it would be helpful, but it is something we'd like to do.
krustlet
-
WASM Instructions
Oh it’s certainly looking like that IMO.
You can run wasm in k8s: https://krustlet.dev/
Docker itself can run wasm: https://wasmlabs.dev/articles/docker-without-containers/
There are a few serverless runtimes based on wasm: https://wasmcloud.com/
A lot of those are powered by wasmtime or WasmEdge.
If you’re wanting to be able to just pull down a random app and run it as wasm, that’s inherently harder with wasm, because you have to recompile, and amazing compiling stuff is always harder than it should be. For example I compiled jq to wasm to other day, so you dont have to worry (as much) about the CVEs that was issued recently. https://github.com/rockwotj/jq-wasi
- The advantage of WASM compared with container runtimes
-
Crafting container images without Dockerfiles
It can, kubevirt is a project for running VMs https://kubevirt.io/ and there have been more esoteric things like WASM (https://github.com/krustlet/krustlet).
- The Python Paradox
-
I Don’t wanna use Docker or kubernetes
Or you can run Krustlet instead of Kubelet. That makes it so you can only run WebAssembly on the cluster - so no Go, no Python, only Rust!
-
Why did the Krustlet project die?
But the project seems to have died: https://github.com/krustlet/krustlet/graphs/contributors
-
Does anybody have a use-case for Scala WASM compilation target?
There are some cloud providers that are starting to offer wasm support. Docker is currently working on wasm https://docs.docker.com/desktop/wasm/ There is also krustlet https://krustlet.dev/ which lets you run wasm in kubernetes
- How I got involved in the Rust community
-
Are V8 isolates the future of computing?
> If one writes Go or Rust, there are much better ways to run them than targeting WASM
wasm has its place, especially for contained workloads that can be wrapped in its strict capability boundaries (think, file-encoding jobs that shouldn't access anything else but said files: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29112713).
> Containers are still the defacto standard.
wasmedge [0], atmo [1], krustlet [2], blueboat [3] and numerous other projects are turning up the heat [4]!
[0] https://github.com/WasmEdge/WasmEdge
[1] https://github.com/suborbital/atmo
[2] https://github.com/krustlet/krustlet
[3] https://github.com/losfair/blueboat
[4] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30155295
- Krustlet: Kubernetes Kubelet in Rust for Running WASM