scrutiny VS Sonarr

I've noticed a quite nice feature in Scrutiny, where older disk temp data is lower resolution than recent data. In queries it would probably look like that:

I cannot look into the scrutiny script. The website recommends "something like"

I would always run the fantastic Scrutiny and set up notifications, so at the very least if some stat changes for the worst you might get a bit of early warning.

Hi. I am trying to understand whether I should trust TrueNAS Scale smartctl tool or Scrutiny (https://github.com/AnalogJ/scrutiny) for S.M.A.R.T results.

Quick Google search later to answer my own question, scrutiny seems to be it. That with LibreNMS sounds like a pretty healthy combo.

https://github.com/AnalogJ/scrutiny should do the trick

Its right there: https://github.com/AnalogJ/scrutiny/blob/master/docker/example.hubspoke.docker-compose.yml

(https://github.com/Sonarr/Sonarr/pull/5200)

TV Shows: Sonarr

I use Nginx for Sonarr/Radarr would I see any general performance benefit when loading their webpages in general? If so, what level of compression would be ideal for this case?

In the /r/selfhosted community Sonarr and Radarr are staples, but their code isn't particularly great and there are lots of bugs people just deal with. Radarr forked Sonarr, their interface is similar but they suffer from disjoint bugs.

There may be better places, since I've just stuck to the same one for years now (and don't need them often enough to look into alternatives), but I usually use either subscene or opensubtitles. There are also programs that can automate it like bazarr, but it requires you to also use Sonarr/Radarr.

Sonarr: Automatically downloads TV series.

Radarr is for movies. Sonarr is for TV shows.

https://github.com/Sonarr/Sonarr is a very good project example for cross platform self hosted api