screenshotbot-oss VS paparazzi

Examples (for Common Lisp, so not citing Emacs): reddit v1, Google's ITA Software that powers airfare search engines (Kayak, Orbitz…), Postgres' pgloader (http://pgloader.io/), which was re-written from Python to Common Lisp, Opus Modus for music composition, the Maxima CAS, PTC 3D designer CAD software (used by big brands worldwide), Grammarly, Mirai, the 3D editor that designed Gollum's face, the ScoreCloud app that lets you whistle or play an instrument and get the music score,

but also the ACL2 theorem prover, used in the industry since the 90s, NASA's PVS provers and SPIKE scheduler used for Hubble and JWT, many companies in Quantum Computing, companies like SISCOG, who plans the transportation systems of european metropolis' underground since the 80s, Ravenpack who's into big-data analysis for financial services (they might be hiring), Keepit (https://www.keepit.com/), Pocket Change (Japan, https://www.pocket-change.jp/en/), the new Feetr in trading (https://feetr.io/, you can search HN), Airbus, Alstom, Planisware (https://planisware.com),

or also the open-source screenshotbot (https://screenshotbot.io), the Kandria game (https://kandria.com/),

and the companies in https://github.com/azzamsa/awesome-lisp-companies and on LispWorks and Allegro's Success Stories.

https://github.com/tamurashingo/reddit1.0/

http://opusmodus.com/

https://www.ptc.com/en/products/cad/3d-design

http://www.izware.com/mirai

https://apps.apple.com/us/app/scorecloud-express/id566535238

This LispWorks comment on reddit is very interesting:

---

[cite]

As a Lispworks user, yes it is super pricey, but it does make sense for certain people. Arguably, Lispworks provides features that aren't available in any other programming language, Lisp or not.

* Support for just about every platform I can imagine. Yes it's expensive, but if I want to port to a new platform I can pay Lispworks, and get it over with. It'll mostly work without too much changes. It works on Android, iOS, Windows, Linux, Mac, and some really obscure systems.

* Application delivery with tree shaking. May be there are other languages that do this, but I haven't worked with something like this before in my career. (Maybe proguard for Java, but that's very rudimentary compared to LW's delivery). The tool I work on delivers a binary that people need to download during the CI jobs for every run, so having it be 100MB is way too big. After compression, my LW delivered binaries come to around 9MB.

* You mention support being expensive. Actually, for simple support questions LW does a pretty good job of responding back to you. I've asked tonnes of questions over the years, and have not paid for a separate support contract apart from the yearly maintenance contract. I suspect they like people asking questions, because then they fix those bugs and it becomes even more rock solid.

* The documentation is glorious. And in the off-chance that I need to know something that's not documented, I just mail them and they'll respond usually by the next working day.

* Very stable Java support (although the API could be better), let's me use the entire Java ecosystem of libraries when I need it.

* The platform itself is rock-solid. Now SBCL is fantastic, but when I ran my servers on SBCL, I would have a crash every now and then. With LW, I can have my server running weeks (current uptime is a month) with reloading code multiple times a day, and everything is still super stable.

There's more, but I think the rest is more negotiable. For instance, the FLI is a lot more polished than using CFFI, which makes a huge difference in productivity when writing native code. Or the fact that its remote-debugger facility can be used as a very stable protocol to programmatically control a remote LW process. I don't use the IDE btw, so I'm not even considering that. I don't use CAPI either, but I mean to someday.

2023, Arnold @tdrhq of Screenshotbot (https://github.com/screenshotbot/screenshotbot-oss) on reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/Common_Lisp/comments/11979q4/common...

[/cite]

You can avoid having to do the step of recording screenshots if you use a tool like Screenshotbot (https://github.com/screenshotbot/screenshotbot-oss) or Vizzy (https://github.com/workday/vizzy)

Oh yeah, github.com/screenshotbot/screenshotbot-oss :)

There are open source tools to achieve this workflow. I've personally built screenshotbot (https://screenshotbot.io / https://github.com/screenshotbot/screenshotbot-oss), I've also built the screenshot testing infrastructure at Facebook. Workday has open-sourced their own tool at https://github.com/workday/vizzy. AirBnb uses another commercial tool called Happo (https://happo.io). Use any of these services with Paparazzi.

There are a few open source tools to do this: there's a tool I built: https://github.com/screenshotbot/screenshotbot-oss similar to the infrastructure at Facebook, and there's another one built at Workday: https://github.com/workday/vizzy. These are screenshot-library agnostic services to notify you on Pull Requests when screenshots change.

Screenshotbot is completely open-source by the way: https://github.com/screenshotbot/screenshotbot-oss

So, I'm in the process of defining something I'm calling an easy-macro. (You can see the code here, but I'm going to extract this into a quicklisp library once I'm happy with it: https://github.com/screenshotbot/screenshotbot-oss/blob/main/src/util/macros.lisp)

I'm the author Screenshotbot (https://github.com/screenshotbot/screenshotbot-oss) , and I think this is exactly what you need. Although the README claims to not support browsers, it does actually support browsers, both in the open source and non open source version. I just need to update the docs.

Component API tests are written for all components in the library. These are Paparazzi snapshot tests that are parameterized to cover all the combinations of values for the properties in the API of a given component. Additionally, they include as parameters: color theme, layout direction, and optionally other properties that may be relevant to the component under test (e.g., font scale).

Looks really nice. Sadly, I wasn't able to test it because it doesn't support application module

Curious what you mean by hilt refuses to work and what you have tried? Usually though if I'm testing the UI of the app, I might use paparazzi for screenshot tests because it doesn't have to run the test on device. Then for a UI integration test for navigation and user flows, use espresso and replace the network data sources with mocks which in your case would be with hilt android test rule and test install in annotation .

/** * Finds all files in the components module which have Compose previews * and generates Paparazzi screenshot tests for them. * * The generated tests can then be used to record screenshots with * ./gradlew components:recordPaparazziInternalDebug * * To verify that the current implementation matches the recorded screenshots * ./gradlew components:verifyPaparazziInternalDebug */ fun main() { val path = System.getProperty("user.dir") ?: error("Can't get user dir") // Paparazzi does not currently work in the app module: https://github.com/cashapp/paparazzi/issues/107 // For now this is hardcoded to only check files in the components module. // If we pull our compose files out of the app module to a separate module this code has to be updated. File(path).walk().filter { it.path.contains("/components/src/main/java") && it.extension == "kt" }.forEach { if (it.readText().contains("@Preview")) { processFileWithPreviews(it) } } } /** * Reads the given file, finds the names of all the functions annotated with @Preview * and uses them to generate a Paparazzi test file with one test for each preview. */ private fun processFileWithPreviews(file: File) { val lines = file.readLines() val previewNames = mutableListOf() var saveNextFunctionName = false var packageName = "" lines.forEachIndexed { i, line -> if (i == 0) { packageName = line.split(" ").last() } if (line.contains("@Preview")) { saveNextFunctionName = true } if (saveNextFunctionName && line.startsWith("fun ")) { previewNames += line.split(" ")[1].removeSuffix("()") saveNextFunctionName = false } } val pathString = file.path.replace("src/main", "src/test").split("java").first() + "java" val testFilePath = pathString.toPath() generatePaparazziTest(packageName, file.nameWithoutExtension + "PaparazziTest", testFilePath, previewNames) } fun generatePaparazziTest(packageName: String, fileName: String, path: Path, previewNames: List) { val classBuilder = TypeSpec.classBuilder(fileName) .superclass(PaparazziTest::class) .addAnnotation( AnnotationSpec.builder(Suppress::class) // KotlinPoet does not let us remove redundant public modifiers or Unit return types for the functions, // but we don't mind for generated code as long as the tests work .addMember("\"RedundantVisibilityModifier\", \"RedundantUnitReturnType\"") .build() ) previewNames.forEach { classBuilder.addFunction( FunSpec.builder(it.removeSuffix("Preview").usLocaleDecapitalize()) .addStatement("paparazziRule.snapshot { $it() }") .addAnnotation(Test::class) .build() ) } val testFile = FileSpec.builder(packageName, fileName) .addType(classBuilder.build()) .addFileComment("AUTO-GENERATED FILE by generate_paparazzi_tests.kt\nDO NOT MODIFY") .build() val nioPath = path.toNioPath() testFile.writeTo(nioPath) }

The good thing is, Square got us covered once more, in regards to the flaky emulators, by providing a screenshot-testing library that does not require an emulator: https://cashapp.github.io/paparazzi/