Sanitize VS Rubyoshka

Compare Sanitize vs Rubyoshka and see what are their differences.

Sanitize

Ruby HTML and CSS sanitizer. (by rgrove)
Template engine Ruby HTML Sanitization CSS
Source Code
Suggest alternative
Edit details

Rubyoshka

Composable templating for Ruby (by digital-fabric)
Template engine HTML component-based
Source Code
Suggest alternative
Edit details
WorkOS
Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
Our great sponsors
Sanitize Rubyoshka
- 3
2,018 186
- 0.0%
5.2 7.3
20 days ago 6 days ago
HTML Ruby
MIT License MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

Sanitize

Posts with mentions or reviews of Sanitize. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

We haven't tracked posts mentioning Sanitize yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.

Rubyoshka

Posts with mentions or reviews of Rubyoshka. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.
  • Papercraft: Composable Templating for Ruby
    1 project | news.ycombinator.com | 3 Jul 2023
  • Papercraft 1.1 released
    1 project | /r/ruby | 3 Jul 2023
    Release notes: https://github.com/orgs/digital-fabric/discussions/111 GitHub repository: https://github.com/digital-fabric/papercraft
  • Future of Ruby – AST Tooling
    1 project | /r/ruby | 14 Nov 2021
    What's interesting about that API is that you can use it to get the AST of a method or Proc, which means you can generate ASTs for dynamically generated code, and you also get to preserve the method or proc's binding! I'm currently exploring this API as a way to "compile" DSLs. This could be prove to be a nice alternative to using #instance_eval.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Sanitize and Rubyoshka you can also consider the following projects:

Slim - Slim is a template language whose goal is to reduce the syntax to the essential parts without becoming cryptic.

Curly - The Curly template language allows separating your logic from the structure of your HTML templates.

Haml - HTML Abstraction Markup Language - A Markup Haiku

Fortitude - Views Are Code: use all the power of Ruby to build views in your own language.

Tilt - Generic interface to multiple Ruby template engines

Hamlit - High Performance Haml Implementation

LaTeXML-Ruby - A Ruby wrapper for LaTeXML

Mustache - Logic-less Ruby templates.

Liquid - Liquid markup language. Safe, customer facing template language for flexible web apps.

Sanitize vs Slim Rubyoshka vs Curly Sanitize vs Haml Rubyoshka vs Slim Sanitize vs Fortitude Rubyoshka vs Tilt Sanitize vs Hamlit Rubyoshka vs LaTeXML-Ruby Sanitize vs Mustache Rubyoshka vs Hamlit Sanitize vs Liquid Rubyoshka vs Haml