sandbox-fpv VS wiki

Something tells me being closed source while naming it OpenIPC and pretending to be under MIT license mighty be a bigger factor.

Being russian and clearly trying to steer project towards drone use https://github.com/OpenIPC/sandbox-fpv doesnt help either, we all know what russian drones are used for right now.

Please check this

https://github.com/openipc/builder?tab=readme-ov-file#list-o...

https://github.com/OpenIPC/wiki/blob/master/en/guide-support...

https://github.com/topics/device-openipc

https://openipc.org/supported-hardware/full-list

I swear sometimes you people post this ignorance bait to get product suggestions.

Local-first cameras are super cheap and easy to find. Most just run their own local RSTP server, which you can connect to live with VLC, homeassistant, whatever. OpenIPC is like ddwrt for ip cameras, here is the supported devices page: https://github.com/OpenIPC/wiki/blob/master/en/guide-support...

But unless you're Richard Stallman, go with the closed source Reolink RTSP camera, which is about $100 and used by big corporate installs. It can integrate with the cloud, but the standard is to have each camera run a RTSP server.

But there isn't a really great open source platform for the kind of multi cam security that businesses might need. You have to do your own storage. But grab four reolinks, send the feeds to homeassistant, and most homeowners will be fine.

For those curious if their devices are supported. The list is here:

https://github.com/OpenIPC/wiki/blob/master/en/guide-support...