wg VS wg

These are issues that I'm aware of that are "tracking" the status of Rust on console:

* <https://github.com/rust-gamedev/wg/issues/90>

* <https://github.com/EmbarkStudios/rust-ecosystem/issues/18>

I say scare quote tracking because due to the nature of console NDAs it's unlikely you'll see much if any useful details in an open public forum.

The issues aren't dissimilar to those facing Godot (although it has the benefit it's able to use existing C++ compilers) and the project has previously outlined some of the issues involved:

* <https://docs.godotengine.org/en/4.0/tutorials/platform/conso...>

* <https://godotengine.org/article/godot-consoles-all-you-need-...>

The current "solution" seems to be console-related development activity occurring via the recently established W4 Games (https://w4games.com/2023/02/28/godot-support-for-consoles-is...) but that's obviously never going to be openly developed without console platform approval (same as any other game engine).

If as me (I am not using Rust to make commercial games yet, though), you accept that you won't be attempting to port itself to a console and let some third-party do it for you, you'll discover that there is already some discussion about it, people already managed to get it working on major consoles, but so far there are no publisher or other company officially doing port of Rust games.

A fast, Rust, JPEG 2000 decoder. Details here. The available options have either performance, cost, or licensing problems. I just need the decode part for classic JPEG 2000 at multi-resolution. Don't need tiles or video.

> Game developers should be investing their time in open tooling without contracts or restrictive licensing

Unfortunately, this is not possible in consoles, because of issues with NDA. Even Bevy can't have an open licensing there: https://github.com/rust-gamedev/wg/issues/90 (Godot also can't: https://docs.godotengine.org/en/stable/tutorials/platform/co...)

I expect that Bevy ports to consoles will take a cut of sales rather than a flat fee :(

rust-game-ports is now officially supported by the Rust GameDev WG. By having this repo on neutral ground, we want to invite the Rust gamedev community to contribute additional game examples to this bundle, so we may collectively expand our comparison-matrix of similar/same games made in different engines. A bit like the realworld app taken one step further.

There is a Github Discussion for this form: https://github.com/rust-gamedev/wg/discussions/121

https://github.com/rust-gamedev/wg/issues/90 ("Rust on Consoles")

Inspired by James Munns's call, and as 2023 is coming to an end, I figure it's a good opportunity to reflect and look forward to 2024. It's been a bit over 1.5 years since I embarked on my embedded Rust journey and it's been nothing less than exciting since. So here it goes.

Because you are an embedded guy. There is the https://github.com/rust-embedded/wg working-group. Rust on embedded is really on a got track forward. There are many chips/vendors that are supported both in no std / std rust world, but still there is a lot of niche things where you can actively help to be the first to get it run in Rust.

To specifically answer your question, here:

* <http://www.areweembeddedyet.com/>

It currently redirects to:

* <https://rust-embedded.org>

Which doesn't really contain anything other than a link to <https://github.com/rust-embedded>.

(via <https://github.com/rust-embedded/wg/issues/15>)

Then the Rust Embedded workgroup provides: - Direction on how to using generics and zero-sized types to achieve functional safety - svd2rust, which provides safe abstractions to peripheral access from SVD files and achieves this functional safety - The embedded HAL spec, which makes porting to different vendors/hardware easy - Peripheral access controllers and HALs for various vendors & hardware

The Rust Embedded Devices Working Group curates a list of useful embedded Rust resources, including Peripheral Access Crates (autogenerated from SVD files), embedded-hal Implementation Crates (hand-written libraries implementing the traits (interfaces) specified by the embedded-hal), and Board Support Crates.

You should also look at https://github.com/rust-embedded/wg/issues/41 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/55011#issuecomment-429336055.

Here's an interesting discussion, consolidated here. My view is you should use a restricted scope atomic (as best as can be supported) and interact with that through a handler struct. I.e. no global state.

Most of the issues are explained in EWG RFC 419. The TL;DR is that some resources need to implement Send to be usable from interrupts, but they must not be sent across cores.