runner-images
just
runner-images | just | |
---|---|---|
51 | 167 | |
9,113 | 17,403 | |
2.5% | - | |
9.8 | 9.0 | |
1 day ago | about 21 hours ago | |
PowerShell | Rust | |
MIT License | Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
runner-images
-
Show HN: Managed GitHub Actions Runners for AWS
Yeah this is a good option if you'd like something to deploy yourself! You can also build an AMI from GitHub's upstream image definition (https://github.com/actions/runner-images/tree/main/images/ub...) if you'd like it to match what's available in GitHub-hosted Actions.
With Depot, we're moving towards deeper performance optimizations and observability than vanilla GitHub runners - we've integrated the runners with a cache storage cluster for instance, and we're working on deeper integration with the compute platform that we built for distributed container image builds - as well as expanding the types of builds we can process beyond Actions and Docker, for instance.
But different options will be better for different folks, and the `philips-labs` project is good at what it does.
- GitHub switched to Docker Compose v2, action needed
-
We Executed a Critical Supply Chain Attack on PyTorch
Whoa, there's a lot of stuff in there [1] that gets installed straight from vendors, without pinning content checksums to a value known-good to Github.
I get it, they want to have the latest versions instead of depending on how long Ubuntu (or, worse, Debian) package maintainers take to package stuff into their mainline repositories... but this attack surface is nuts.
[1] https://github.com/actions/runner-images/tree/main/images/ub...
-
Terraform module for scalable GitHub action runners on AWS
I had a similar experience with ARC (actions-runner-controller).
One of the machines in the fleet failed to sync its clock via NTP. Once a job X got scheduled to it, the runner pod failed authentication due to incorrect clock time, and then the whole ARC system started to behave incorrectly: job X was stuck without runners, until another workflow job Y was created, and then X got run but Y became stuck. There were also other wierd behaviors like this so I eventually rebuilt everything based on VMs and stopped using ARC.
Using VMs also allowed me to support the use of the official runner images [0], which is good for compatibility.
I feel more people would benefit from managed "self-hosted" runners, so I started DimeRun [1] to provide cheaper GHA runners for people who don't have the time/willingness to troubleshoot low-level infra issues.
[0]: https://github.com/actions/runner-images
- Apple Silicon (M1) powered macOS runners are now available in public beta
-
macOS Containers v0.0.1
Reminds me: Still waiting for native ARM support on GitHub Actions https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/5631
-
Question on using Linux Self Hosted Agents with VMSS
Used https://github.com/actions/runner-images to get the packages needed for Ubuntu 22.04 As the packer requires a builder, I used "null" builder to set it as localhost ref: https://developer.hashicorp.com/packer/docs/builders/null (It was way difficult to figure it out the 1st time) I had to modify the .pkr.hcl file to pick my provisioners. I could not understand the use of /opt/hostedtoolcache folder (which I did later)
- steam run problem after install. missing depedencies
- VM Scale Set in Running Status but Failed Provisioning state...leaving agent jobs queued with "No agents in pool VMSS-Prod are currently able to service this request."
- [HELP] Building Unity WebGL projects in Azure Devops CI/CD pipeline
just
-
I stopped worrying and loved Makefiles
I don't like makefiles, but I've been enjoying justfiles: https://github.com/casey/just
- Just a Command Runner
-
Ask HN: Any tool for managing large and variable command lines?
I started using just [0] on my projects and have been very happy so far. It is very similar to make but focused on commands rather than build outputs.
Define your recipes and then you can compose them as needed.
[0] https://github.com/casey/just
-
Ask HN: What software sparks joy when using?
just - https://github.com/casey/just
-
GitHub switched to Docker Compose v2, action needed
Welp there is absolute chaos in that thread -- guess it's not an April Fools joke.
I wonder if relying on CI for anything other than provisioning machines is a mistake -- maybe we should have never moved from doing things from local scripts written in $LANGUAGE.
That said, I'm probably biased since I'm a massive fan of things like `make` and more appropriately for the current age, `just`[0]
[0]: https://github.com/casey/just
-
Which command did you run 1731 days ago?
> When a command has some cognitive requirements I create a script with some ${1:-default} values and I store them all in $PATH enabled local/bin
I would consider using just for this:
https://github.com/casey/just
-
Using Make – writing less Makefile
Your coworker's experience is more principled: Make is a mediocre tool for executing commands. It wasn't ever designed for that. Although it is pretty common to see what you are mentioning in projects because it doesn't require installing a dependency.
For a repo where an easy to install (single binary) dependency is a non-issue, consider using just. [1] You get `just -l` where you can see all the command available, the ability to use different languages, and overall simpler command writing.
[1] https://github.com/casey/just
-
Show HN: Just.sh – compiler that turns Justfiles into portable shell scripts
This is fantastic, but I'd say that this solution is somewhat in response to this open issue from 2019:
https://github.com/casey/just/issues/429
I really wish just was included as a package in distributions.
-
Sharing Saturday #496
So far, I didn't work on new features at all but on stabilizing the ground for further development: 1. CMake lists and modules were rewritten a lot, now managing builds and their configurations is much lesser pain. 2. Brought in Justfile for regular tasks, and it's great, no less. 3. Linters, formatters, analyzers for almost all the code (except for Janet for now, as because of it being a niche and young technology, it didn't get enough attention yet). 4. ECS stub. Now runtime class doesn't look like a god object. 5. Started writing unit tests which didn't happen with my personal projects before and maybe indicates how serious am I about this one :D 6. Some of previously hardcoded data has been moved to INI files. Now, if I release the game in 10 years, and in 10 more years some eccentric person decides to make a variant of it, it will be slightly simpler.
-
What’s with DevOps engineers using `make` of all things?
i've grown to like this for my personal projects. https://github.com/casey/just
What are some alternatives?
jellyscrub - Smooth mouse-over video scrubbing previews for Jellyfin.
Task - A task runner / simpler Make alternative written in Go
paths-filter - Conditionally run actions based on files modified by PR, feature branch or pushed commits
cargo-make - Rust task runner and build tool.
json-tidy - Pretty prints JSON from stdin, files, or URLs
cargo-xtask
changed-files - :octocat: Github action to retrieve all (added, copied, modified, deleted, renamed, type changed, unmerged, unknown) files and directories.
Taskfile - Repository for the Taskfile template.
combine-prs-workflow - Combine/group together PRs (for example from Dependabot and similar services)
CodeLLDB - A native debugger extension for VSCode based on LLDB
runner - The Runner for GitHub Actions :rocket:
cargo-release - Cargo subcommand `release`: everything about releasing a rust crate.