runc
nanos
runc | nanos | |
---|---|---|
32 | 27 | |
11,441 | 2,477 | |
0.8% | 1.8% | |
9.3 | 9.2 | |
about 23 hours ago | 7 days ago | |
Go | C | |
Apache License 2.0 | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
runc
-
Nanos – A Unikernel
I can speak to this. Containers, and by extension k8s, break a well known security boundary that has existed for a very long time - whether you are using a real (hardware) server or a virtual machine on the cloud if you pop that instance/server generally speaking you only have access to that server. Yeh, you might find a db config with connection details if you landed on say a web app host but in general you still have to work to start popping the next N servers.
That's not the case when you are running in k8s and the last container breakout was just announced ~1 month ago: https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/security/advisories/G... .
At the end of the day it is simply not a security boundary. It can solve other problems but not security ones.
- Several container breakouts due to internally leaked fds
- Container breakout through process.cwd trickery and leaked fds
-
US Cybersecurity: The Urgent Need for Memory Safety in Software Products
It's interesting that, in light of things like this, you still see large software companies adding support for new components written in non-memory safe languages (e.g. C)
As an example Red Hat OpenShift added support for crun(https://github.com/containers/crun) this year(https://cloud.redhat.com/blog/whats-new-in-red-hat-openshift...), which is written in C as an alternative to runc, which is written in Go(https://github.com/opencontainers/runc)...
-
Run Firefox on ChromeOS
Rabbit hole indeed. That wasn't related to my job at the time, lol. The job change came with a company-provided computer and that put an end to the tinkering.
BTW, I found my hacks to make runc run on Chromebook: https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/compare/main...gabrys...
-
Crun: Fast and lightweight OCI runtime and C library for running containers
being the main author of crun, I can clarify that statement: I am not a fan of Go _for this particular use case_.
Using C instead of Go avoided a bunch of the workarounds that exists in runc to workaround the Go runtime, e.g. https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/blob/main/libcontaine...
-
Best virtualization solution with Ubuntu 22.04
runc
-
Bringing Memory Safety to sudo and su - with Ferrous Systems and Tweedegolf
Not OP, but if I had to guess, a lot of this can be picked up by just observing common security issues in the Linux space, since similar mistakes and oversights have caused quite a few real-world CVEs in the past, e.g. this random example of a TOCTTOU vulnerability in runc.
- Containers - entre historia y runtimes
- [email protected]+incompatible with ubuntu 22.04 on arm64 ?
nanos
-
Nanos – A Unikernel
I am a bit confused, there are three sites:
* https://nanos.org/
* https://nanovms.com/
* https://ops.city/
And I am not sure what "thing" I am using. Is there some disambiguation? I know is OPS is the orchestration CLI, but I am confused at the difference between Nanos and NanoVMs. What should I call the section of my README that deals with this tech? Currently gone with Nanos/OPS but I am confused.
-
Kolibri OS: fits on a floppy disk, programmed using interrupts
I work with https://nanos.org && https://ops.city - we can run thousands of these on commodity hardware.
-
Mirage – A programming framework for building type-safe, modular systems
Unik was just a build tool that utilized other projects like Rump, Mirage, IncludeOS, etc. It's now dead since Solo pivoted a very long time ago to service mesh/api gateways.
The GoRump port they use was from us and then we realized we needed to code our own from the ground up for many reasons so we wrote https://nanos.org (runs as a go unikernel in GCP).
-
Building a unikernel that runs WebAssembly – part 1
A couple unikernel projects that caught my eye in the past may be of interest to you. I have no experience with them, so I can't speak to their quality though.
https://unikraft.org/
https://github.com/nanovms/nanos
- Build Your Own Docker with Linux Namespaces, Cgroups, and Chroot
-
Running Postgres as a Unikernel
Definitely agree with the top part, however, I should note that, ops, the tool's, whole existence is to create disk images and upload them to any cloud, any hypervisor.
In particular, both https://ops.city && https://nanos.org are Go unikernels running on GCP and their deploys take just a few seconds to push out. AWS can be even faster cause we skip the s3 upload part. We also have lots of people using Azure which would be utilizing vhdx.
- Ask HN: Resources for Building a Webserver in C?
- A kernel designed to run only one application in a virtualized environment
-
Applications available in unikernels?
I'm with that organization that works on https://nanos.org and https://ops.city . If you aren't a software engineer but still would like to use unikernels you're in luck - we also have a package repository at https://repo.ops.city/ (running as a go unikernel on GCP) that will allow you to run and deploy pre-made applications. If you don't see something that you'd like to us there's also a way of importing docker containers into unikernels via ops which works for most (but not all) applications.
-
Ask HN: Software with biggest potential for positive impact in 5 years?
I think Unikernels like NanoVMs (https://nanos.org/) will become more important. They are more efficient and more secure than than full operating systems. Right now, I think there are no good monitoring solutions available (or at least I am not aware of any). You can't just ssh to your server, so if something goes wrong, it can be hard to debug. And they are certainly not integrated into bigger monitoring solutions like Dynatrace. But once the infrastructure is available, I would expect a large percentage of Linux servers to be replaced with unikernels.
What are some alternatives?
crun - A fast and lightweight fully featured OCI runtime and C library for running containers
unikraft - A next-generation cloud native kernel designed to unlock best-in-class performance, security primitives and efficiency savings.
Moby - The Moby Project - a collaborative project for the container ecosystem to assemble container-based systems
rusty-hermit - Hermit for Rust. [Moved to: https://github.com/hermit-os/hermit-rs]
youki - A container runtime written in Rust
OPS - ops - build and run nanos unikernels
podman - Podman: A tool for managing OCI containers and pods.
linuxkit - A toolkit for building secure, portable and lean operating systems for containers
containerd - An open and reliable container runtime
unik - The Unikernel & MicroVM Compilation and Deployment Platform
conmon - An OCI container runtime monitor.
dark - Darklang main repo, including language, backend, and infra