rules_rust VS proc-macro-workshop

The same reason Bazel builds avoid using Cargo when building Rust software, so I'll describe why Bazel would do this:

- Bazel wants to cache remote resources, like each respective crate's source files.

- Bazel then wants to build each crate in a sandbox, and cache the build artifacts

This is an established practice, and Nix wants to drive the build for the same reasons.

See:

- https://github.com/bazelbuild/rules_rust

- https://github.com/google/cargo-raze

To answer your question, I don't know if Soong or Bazel can reuse the files produced by an incremental Rust compilation. I tried searching the rules_rust repository and found some discussions, but nothing that clearly told me "Yes, this is supported".

Bazel doesn't allow targeting a lot of platforms (especially embedded) from Rust, even when the Rust ecosystem supports these targets. Something is off with its design if new work needs to be done for every platform that's already available behind an interface that's as consistent as what rustc gives.

What is supported needs to be inferred from this file, as far as I can tell: https://github.com/bazelbuild/rules_rust/blob/main/rust/plat...

You might be overjoyed to learn that you can use a build tool that forces you to manually write out the dependencies between each file.

I am using rules_rust and have the VS Code Bazel plugin installed, but I am still not getting autocomplete.

Other than that, the performance of both for builds should be determined exactly by the organization of code into separate crates and the rustc invocations. Bazel generally encourages smaller crates, but that's very subtle. There is at least 1 case I can think of where rustc is overfit to cargo, in a way that is not easily replicable by bazel, which is the metadata/rlib pipelining https://github.com/bazelbuild/rules_rust/issues/228

Rust integrates pretty seamlessly into Bazel projects via rules_rust (https://github.com/bazelbuild/rules_rust). The existing rules even allow for c calling rust and rust calling c. Example: https://github.com/bazelbuild/rules_rust/blob/main/examples/...

With any compiled language you can use the compiler and vendor your dependencies instead of using the language's conventional package manager. For example, nothing prevents skipping Cargo and building Rust directly with rustc the way Bazel does.

https://github.com/bazelbuild/rules_rust

Tangentially, the proc macro workshop walks through building a derive macro implementing a builder pattern. From experience, I can tell I couldn't ever write proc macros just by reading the manual, going through it is really helpful https://github.com/dtolnay/proc-macro-workshop/blob/master/README.md

I am working on the proc macro workshop and am a little stuck on the builder portion of the workshop. Step 08-unrecognized-attributes wants you to handle the car where the field modifier has a misspelled portion (eac instead of each)

I would very much second the suggestion to do David Tolnay’s Proc Macro Workshop if you want to start understanding how to write them. I’d been writing Rust for years but always kind of avoided proc macros.

When I had a need for them, I went through only the first section of the workshop and everything clicked. You can just do the derive macro section and all the strange and scary-looking macro syntax will make sense. I realized that there is only a bit of extra syntax but it’s used very often so it can seem a little overwhelming when reading macro code.

https://github.com/dtolnay/proc-macro-workshop

Another good one imo is the proc-macro-workshop.

Don't be afraid of proc macros and derive macros, they rule. Study the basic examples. Crates like darling and resources like David Tolnay's workshop will help. Write derives for your simpler traits and impress your colleagues.

Regarding 4, I think that macros are an interesting intermediate/advanced topic. I personally loved the material from https://github.com/dtolnay/proc-macro-workshop

It took me a while to get anything done. My mistake : I came accross the procedural macros workshop several times, and every time I dismissed it, thinking - meh I'll just hack together exactly what I need and move on. Then finally I figured there is no way around it. The builder exercise sounds boring but it covers the topic pretty well. And then I went on to the debug one and from there was able to build the proc macro I wanted.

Hey! While researching, I found this: https://github.com/dtolnay/proc-macro-workshop

Rust Latam: procedural macros workshop - David Tolnay