rufus-web VS Chota

To keep a long story short, the base BIOS GRUB bootloader used for optical usually does not embed the necessary modules such as fat part_msdos, because none of these are required for optical. But you can't boot USB flash drives without them. See for instance the description of how Rufus recompiles GRUB, with these modules, from the official source.

For my past projects, I used a simple CSS framework, Chota, which I override with custom stuff, and at build time everything is compressed to keep only CSS that is used by the HTML. I structure my code to be able to re-use small parts of the style (menu, sections, cards) depending on the project.

Instead of using commonly used frameworks (like Spring Framework) I preffered to use something that is small and doesn't have "magic" in it. So I've chosen Javalin as a simple web framework, added MongoDB client libraries nad jte as template engine. To show that simple and clean looking apps doesn't need any big JS libraries I've selected chota - one of micro CSS frameworks.

Chota is nice, 3kb.

I'm not sure if this comment will be upvoted in this subreddit, but both the most professional, and the easiest, way to accomplish this is to build the form in Vue or React, or even just a bare HTML form and style it if you like with something like chota, and create the rendering using some kind of JavaScript 3d rendering engine like this one.

Chota is a tiny super lightweight, simple to use, lightweight CSS framework where all sets of modules are packed in about 3Kb. It does not require any preprocessors, just add it within your project and start using it. It is very simple to extend due to CSS variables. It comes with plenty of components and utilities, like a magic 12 column grid. It has good semantics, can be switched easily to dark mode, and supports icons out-of-the-box as well. Similar to other lightweight CSS frameworks, remembering different class names is no longer necessary.

Yo hago páginas web en chota