rspec-rails VS Parallel Tests

I am very comfortable with Minitest in Ruby. When I started to learn Rails, though, I was surprised by how different RSpec was. In case .NET testing is equally unlike the xUnit style, I should learn the idioms.

It supports both RSpec and Minitest as well as any other testing gem. There are flexible configurations options which allow to configure editor with needed testing tool.

I'm a huge supporter for TDD(Test Driven Development). Almost every piece code should be tested. During my co-op more than half of the time I spent writing test for my PR. I believe that experience really helped me understand the necessity of testing. I was surprised to see how similar the testing framework in JS and Ruby are. I used Jest which is very similar to RSpec I have used during my co-op. To mock http resquest I used Nock kinda similar to something called VCR.

The describe and it keywords are popularly used in other JavaScript testing frameworks to write and organize unit tests. This style originated in Ruby's Rspec testing library and is commonly known as spec-style testing.

5. Automated Tests: Unit tests are automated tests that verify the behavior of a small unit of code in isolation. I like to write unit tests for every bug reported by a user. This way, I can reproduce the bug in a controlled environment and verify that the fix works as expected and that we wont see a regression. There are many different JavaScript test frameworks like Jest, cypress, mocha, and jasmine. We use Rspec and Minitest for unit and integration tests in our rails application.

When it comes to testing code, both frameworks are very much comparable since you can test either using the versatile RSpec library.

When starting a Rails project, you have a lot of decisions to make. Whether or not to write tests should not be one of them. The big decision is to use Minitest or Rspec. Both of those testing frameworks are great and provide everything you need to test a Rails application thoroughly.

RSpec

rspec-rails factory_bot_rails faker

Ruby testing with RSpec

Thanks for that feedback. For some more context, the container is designed to run 40+ processes in parallel sending remote instructions to AWS Device Farm for testing, so I suspect that the RAM usage is expected in this case. If you have any recommendations on re-architecting the execution here I'm all ears.

I know changing from RSpec to MiniTest requires some changes on how you organize the tests and how you think about writing them, but I found that I like MiniTest better after using it for more time, I think it goes straight to the point and it's better integrated (don't quote me on this, but I think minitest handles parallel tests better than RSpec in Rails app because that feature was added with mini test in mind, you would need to add an extra gem for rspec for that https://github.com/grosser/parallel_tests)

Several members of our team worked together to get the parallel_tests gem working for our codebase. Most of our tests were fine running in parallel, but we found enough that made assumptions about the order they would be run in that we had to do some fixing and rewriting. We kept this work in a feature branch, and kept chipping away at it until all the tests would pass.

Let's get one thing out of the way. If you use RSpec rather than Minitest, you are out of luck. RSpec does not support Rails 6 built-in parallel testing. There is an ongoing discussion about changing that, but there hasn't been any significant progress for a while. If you want parallel tests with RSpec, your best bet is still using third-party gems such as grosser/parallel_tests.