rqlite VS chiselstore

Compare rqlite vs chiselstore and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
rqlite chiselstore
112 4
14,862 563
1.3% 0.9%
9.9 0.0
3 days ago over 1 year ago
Go Rust
MIT License MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

rqlite

Posts with mentions or reviews of rqlite. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-01-04.

chiselstore

Posts with mentions or reviews of chiselstore. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-10-04.
  • SQLite: QEMU All over Again?
    11 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 4 Oct 2022
    it? What's the big deal about not fitting well with SQLx? This isn't a requirement for such a library to be successful. What other problems is it allegedly suffering from?

    [1] https://github.com/chiselstrike/chiselstore

  • Fly.io Buys Litestream
    15 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 9 May 2022
  • Distributed SQLite for Rust
    5 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 15 Dec 2021
    I've looked at the https://github.com/chiselstrike/chiselstore/blob/main/proto/... - and calling the service "RPC" is not great if this is going to be bundled with other gRPC services - why not call it "chiselStore" or something more concrete?

    on a 2nd note, each method should have it's own Request Response, and ideally they should be suffixed same way. Returning same proto for multiple methods might break future compatibility - e.g. what if AppendEntries needs to return somehing else than Void? - ideally you make it from the start to return an empty AppendEntriesResponse, and then you can extend that proto.

    https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/docs/proto3#u...

What are some alternatives?

When comparing rqlite and chiselstore you can also consider the following projects:

dqlite - Embeddable, replicated and fault-tolerant SQL engine.

sqlite_fdw - SQLite Foreign Data Wrapper for PostgreSQL

litestream - Streaming replication for SQLite.

risingwave - Cloud-native SQL stream processing, analytics, and management. KsqlDB and Apache Flink alternative. πŸš€ 10x more productive. πŸš€ 10x more cost-efficient.

cockroach - CockroachDB - the open source, cloud-native distributed SQL database.

bolt

exqlite - An SQLite3 driver for Elixir

etcd - Distributed reliable key-value store for the most critical data of a distributed system [Moved to: https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd]

incubator-horaedb - HoraeDB is a high-performance, distributed, cloud native time-series database.

TinyGo - Go compiler for small places. Microcontrollers, WebAssembly (WASM/WASI), and command-line tools. Based on LLVM.

Prisma - Next-generation ORM for Node.js & TypeScript | PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, SQL Server, SQLite, MongoDB and CockroachDB