riscv-isa-manual
compiler-explorer
riscv-isa-manual | compiler-explorer | |
---|---|---|
41 | 191 | |
3,293 | 15,198 | |
2.6% | 1.5% | |
9.7 | 9.9 | |
4 days ago | 7 days ago | |
TeX | TypeScript | |
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 | BSD 2-clause "Simplified" License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
riscv-isa-manual
-
The Improved RISC-V Specification (latest WIP draft)
https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/releases
Regarding the recent "How to improve the RISC-V specification" post [0], I just wanted to point out, that the latest draft manual is already a great improvement. (see link above)
It includes a lot of the newly ratified extensions: bitmanip,zicond,vector,vector crypto, ...
And there are a bunch of included SAIL definitions for bitmanip and zicond, but other instructions are still missing the SAIL code. Most notably, the SAIL definitions from the RV32I/RV64I base isa are also missing.
I asked for the further SAIL integration plans here: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/issues/1369
Here is an example SAIL snippet from cpopw:
let bitcount = 0;
-
How to improve the RISC-V specification
I encourage you to look at the newest isa manual draft on github: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/releases
It includes the more recently extensions, and e.g. the bitmanip instructions all have associated pseudo code.
Here is e.g. the code for cpopw:
let bitcount = 0;
- Need help with designing a basic RISC V processor?
-
The legend of “x86 CPUs decode instructions into RISC form internally”
I tried searching the spec [1] for "overflow" and here is what it says at page 17:
> We did not include special instruction-set support for overflow checks on integer arithmetic operations in the base instruction set, as many overflow checks can be cheaply implemented using RISC-V branches.
> For general signed addition, three additional instructions after the addition are required
Is this "cheap", replacing 1 instruction with four? According to some old mainframe era research (cannot find link now), addition is the most often used instruction and they suggest that we should replace each one with four?
Their "rationale" is not rational at all. It doesn't make sense.
Overflow check should be free (no additional instructions required), otherwise we will see the same story we have seen for last 50 years: compiler writers do not want to implement checks because they are expensive; language designers do not want to use proper arithmetic because it is expensive. As a result, there will be errors and vulnerabilities. A vicious circle.
[1] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/releases/download/...
- 64-bit Arm ∩ 64-bit RISC V
- Beginner question: F extension
-
Riscv Ghidra Instruction Manual
Why not use the actual release PDF instead from their github? https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual
-
How would I go about designing an 8-bit RISC-V CPU? Is it possible?
https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/releases/download/Priv-v1.12/riscv-privileged-20211203.pdf Part 2
-
Have to convert a C language code into RISC-V MIPS
If you don't want to cheat then read the RISC-V ISA manual: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/releases/download/Ratified-IMAFDQC/riscv-spec-20191213.pdf
-
How does a computer understand machine language?
Yeah you are on the right track. Processors are designed on top of an Instruction Set Architecture (ISA). For an example you can look on top of the RISC-V specifications:https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/releases/download/Ratified-IMAFDQC/riscv-spec-20191213.pdf (possible PDF download)
compiler-explorer
-
What if null was an Object in Java?
At least on android arm64, looks like a `dmb ishst` is emitted after the constructor, which allows future loads to not need an explicit barrier. Removing `final` from the field causes that barrier to not be emitted.
https://godbolt.org/#g:!((g:!((g:!((h:codeEditor,i:(filename...
- Ask HN: Which books/resources to understand modern Assembler?
-
3rd Edition of Programming: Principles and Practice Using C++ by Stroustrup
You said You won't get "extreme performance" from C++ because it is buried under the weight of decades of compatibility hacks.
Now your whole comment is about vector behavior. You haven't talked about what 'decades of compatibility hacks' are holding back performance. Whatever behavior you want from a vector is not a language limitation.
You could write your own vector and be done with it, although I'm still not sure what you mean, since once you reserve capacity a vector still doubles capacity when you overrun it. The reason this is never a performance obstacle is that if you're going to use more memory anyway, you reserve more up front. This is what any normal programmer does and they move on.
Show what you mean here:
https://godbolt.org/
I've never used ISPC. It's somewhat interesting although since it's Intel focused of course it's not actually portable.
I guess now the goal posts are shifting. First it was that "C++ as a language has performance limitations" now it's "rust has a vector that has a function I want and also I want SIMD stuff that doesn't exist. It does exist? not like that!"
Try to stay on track. You said there were "decades of compatibility hacks" holding back C++ performance then you went down a rabbit hole that has nothing to do with supporting that.
-
C++ Insights – See your source code with the eyes of a compiler
C++ Insights is available online at https://cppinsights.io/
It is also available at a touch of a button within the most excellent https://godbolt.org/
along side the button that takes your code sample to https://quick-bench.com/
Those sites and https://cppreference.com/ are what I'm using constantly while coding.
I recently discovered https://whitebox.systems/ It's a local app with a $69 one-time charge. And, it only really works with "C With Classes" style functions. But, it looks promising as another productivity boost.
-
Ask HN: How can I learn about performance optimization?
[P&H RISC] https://www.google.com/books/edition/_/e8DvDwAAQBAJ
Compiler Explorer by Matt Godbolt [Godbolt] can help better understand what code a compiler generates under different circumstances.
[Godbolt] https://godbolt.org
The official CPU architecture manuals from CPU vendors are surprisingly readable and information-rich. I only read the fragments that I need or that I am interested in and move on. Here is the Intel’s one [Intel]. I use the Combined Volume Set, which is a huge PDF comprising all the ten volumes. It is easier to search in when it’s all in one file. I can open several copies on different pages to make navigation easier.
Intel also has a whole optimization reference manual [Intel] (scroll down, it’s all on the same page). The manual helps understand what exactly the CPU is doing.
[Intel] https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/t...
Personally, I believe in automated benchmarks that measure end-to-end what is actually important and notify you when a change impacts performance for the worse.
-
Managing mutable data in Elixir with Rust
Let's compile it with https://godbolt.org/, turn on some optimisations and inspect the IR (-O2 -emit-llvm). Copying out the part that corresponds to the while loop:
4:
-
Free MIT Course: Performance Engineering of Software Systems
resources were extra useful when building deeper intuitions about GPU performance for ML models at work and in graduate school.
- CMU's "Deep Learning Systems" Course is hosted online and has YouTube lectures online. While not generally relevant to software performance, it is especially useful for engineers interested in building strong fundamentals that will serve them well when taking ML models into production environments: https://dlsyscourse.org/
- Compiler Explorer is a tool that allows you easily input some code in and check how the assembly output maps to the source. I think this is exceptionally useful for beginner/intermediate programmers who are familiar with one compiled high-level language and have not been exposed to reading lots of assembly. It is also great for testing how different compiler flags affect assembly output. Many people used to coding in C and C++ probably know about this, but I still run into people who haven't so I share it whenever performance comes up: https://godbolt.org/
-
Verifying Rust Zeroize with Assembly...including portable SIMD
To really understand what's going on here we can look at the compiled assembly code. I'm working on a Mac and can do this using the objdump tool. Compiler Explorer is also a handy tool but doesn't seem to support Arm assembly which is what Rust will use when compiling on Apple Silicon.
- 4B If Statements
-
Operator precedence doubt
Play around with it in godbolt if you're really curious: https://godbolt.org/
What are some alternatives?
riscv-elf-psabi-doc - A RISC-V ELF psABI Document
C++ Format - A modern formatting library
riscv-emulator-docker-image
rust - Empowering everyone to build reliable and efficient software.
amaranth - A modern hardware definition language and toolchain based on Python
format-benchmark - A collection of formatting benchmarks
riscv-v-spec - Working draft of the proposed RISC-V V vector extension
papers - ISO/IEC JTC1 SC22 WG21 paper scheduling and management
vroom - VRoom! RISC-V CPU
rustc_codegen_gcc - libgccjit AOT codegen for rustc
open-source-cs - Video discussing this curriculum:
firejail - Linux namespaces and seccomp-bpf sandbox