template VS graphiql

I’ve been using to avoid the whole “create DOM elements in JS” thing, and it’s been working well so far:

https://github.com/retrohacker/template

This is exactly what I'm doing with my personal "framework" I use for client contracts. It's just Web Components with a handy class based wrapper. I call it Template, since it's based off tags.

It's a joy to work in, feels "frameworky" but it's standard web standards with <100 lines of convenience JS wrapped around it. There is no magic beyond what the browser provides - I like I like it that way.

https://github.com/retrohacker/template/

It's "open source" as a reference. Just using it for myself. There aren't many docs beyond notes to myself. You're welcome to kick the tires. If you like it I'd entertain PRs and stuff but it's such a small library forking is probably entirely reasonable to make your own flavor too.

Cheers and happy hacking!

> FYI, GraphiQL is deprecated, GraphQL Playground is a good alternative.

You have this backwards.

https://github.com/graphql/graphql-playground/issues/1366#is...

https://github.com/graphql/graphiql

GraphQL is declarative and self-documenting by nature. There’s a single endpoint, and all available data, relationships, and APIs can be explored and consumed by client teams (via the GraphiQL interface or just Introspection) without constantly going back and forth with backend teams.

GraphiQL is one of the most well-known GraphQL IDEs. Originally developed by Facebook, it is an in-browser tool that enables developers to write, validate, and test GraphQL queries. It is open-source and can be integrated into any project that uses GraphQL. Recently, GraphiQL has been revamped with a new UI and several new features as you can read in ths blog post I wrote earlier.

Nice! I think you might like it.

Ah yeah, that does take a while to unpack. I think a lot of the complexity there is dealing with a non-react library and the dynamic import(s). Binding non-react libraries can be a bit rough.

I do think it's a good example to show the big advantage of hooks, if you look at the use of the hook, super clean: https://github.com/graphql/graphiql/blob/50674292c55eadf0e61...

Great way to contain complexity and make usage really clean and simple!

Graphiql: https://github.com/graphql/graphiql

After GraphQL Playground became part of the GraphQL Foundation, the need for having just one GraphQL IDE became more important. So the GraphQL Foundation decided to merge GraphiQL and GraphQL Playground into one tool. GraphiQL 1 relied on major tech debt and multiple dependencies that were outdated and hard to maintain. With the merge of GraphiQL and GraphQL Playground, the GraphQL Foundation decided to create a new version of GraphiQL, which is now called GraphiQL 2. The design and creation of GraphiQL 2 was all documented in Github.

#3: As I mentioned above, we use GraphQL Code Generator for generating TypeScript types and composables, as well as type checking our queries against the schema. This results in fully type-safe code from the back-end all the way to the front-end. As far as editor extensions go, the GraphQL: Language Feature Support VSCode extension should work fine, I use the language server part of that extension with Neovim. It provides autocompletion based on the schema and diagnostics. It looks like it might not work in .vue files though.

OneGraphiQL is a data explorer that allows us to build up our GraphQL queries and mutations. It is the OneGraph implementation of GraphiQL, which can be used with any GraphQL endpoint. GraphiQL is the perfect way to discover the different things we can request. It is generated from the GraphQL schema and provides helpful documentation for the graph's queries, mutations and types. Additionally, it can intelligently suggest options while we are building our queries and mutations.

If this is a critical functionality, you could raise an issue (with proper reasons why it is important) for sort support either in graphql-js or GraphiQL (guessing this would be a better place) repositories.