rescript-mui
purescript
| rescript-mui | purescript | |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 52 | |
| 246 | 8,464 | |
| -0.4% | 0.4% | |
| 8.6 | 6.5 | |
| 20 days ago | 22 days ago | |
| ReScript | Haskell | |
| MIT License | BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
rescript-mui
-
From TypeScript to ReScript
I've been using ReScript for a few months now. So far I mostly like it, but it takes some time to get used to it. The error messages can be confusing though so I try not to depend too much on type inference. The other downside is that some bindings for some of the web apis seem to be missing (like for the types in the Dom module).
Btw, for Material UI there are already bindings [1]
[1] https://github.com/cca-io/rescript-material-ui
-
Help with bindings in @rescript/react
Some even wrote binding generators, as it is hard to keep up with the growth of UI libraries: https://github.com/jsiebern/bs-material-ui/tree/master/tools/binding-generator
purescript
- Learning Elm by porting a medium-sized web front end from React (2019)
- Ask HN: Interest in a Rust-Inspired Language Compiling to JavaScript?
-
Building React Components Using Unions in TypeScript
Naturally I’d recommend using a better language such as ReScript or Elm or PureScript or F#‘s Fable + Elmish, but “React” is the king right now and people perceive TypeScript as “less risky” for jobs/hiring, so here we are.
-
Is there a better way to do read-only types
Unless you want to switch to https://www.purescript.org/.
-
Why I'm Leaving Elm
PureScript[1][2] seems pretty alive these days. From my relatively small, self-contained experiments, it's a lot more flexible and expressive than Elm at the expense of (maybe?) being a bit harder to learn up-front.
[1]: https://www.purescript.org/
[2]:https://github.com/purescript/purescript
- (strongly typed) functional language compilers running in browser
-
purescript VS purs-eval - a user suggested alternative
2 projects | 2 Mar 2023
- Por que Elm é uma linguagem tão deliciosa?
-
I will die on this hill (curve)
*cough* I mean Purescript.
-
My main beef with Haskell/JS
Assuming this is a PS knock, fwiw this went away a good bit ago: https://github.com/purescript/purescript/releases/tag/v0.14.2
What are some alternatives?
Idris2 - A purely functional programming language with first class types
fp-ts - Functional programming in TypeScript
melange - A mixture of tooling combined to produce JavaScript from OCaml & Reason
reason - Simple, fast & type safe code that leverages the JavaScript & OCaml ecosystems
rescript-compiler - The compiler for ReScript.
elm-reactor
agda-mode-vscode - agda-mode on VS Code
Elm - Compiler for Elm, a functional language for reliable webapps.
genType - Auto generation of idiomatic bindings between Reason and JavaScript: either vanilla or typed with TypeScript/FlowType.
rescript-react - Official ReScript bindings for ReactJS