remote-standalone VS -

I published this article on Template Animation (aka DOM Templating) 12 years ago:

https://benkoworks.com/your-templating-engine-sucks-and-ever...

It fits nicely with this goal. My colleagues and I created a tool that allows HTML developers to work in HTML by compiling HTML using a Chrome extension, and then allowing developers to compile the same in their code platform of choice and operate on the DOM:

https://github.com/iaindooley/Fragmentify

https://github.com/iaindooley/fragmentify-js

Even if you're doing a SPA you can use this same method, by sending updates over the wire and doing the processing on the server. We created a standalone package that facilitated that by loading the initial page from the server then transparently allowing the server to send just the changes to the page and having them applied on the client side:

https://github.com/dgrinton/remote-standalone

The combination of "remote" and "fragmentify" and Template Animation/DOM Templating, in my opinion, would be a tremendous "retreat to move forward" in web development technologies.

Many years ago a colleague and I wrote a stand-alone version of a package for my own arcane php framework called Remote.

The idea was that you write in Web 1.0 and immediately get a Web 2.0 front end because it just updates what it needs to.

I still think this is the holy grail of frontends:

https://github.com/dgrinton/remote-standalone

I like this. I share a philosophy similar to this: hew close to the grain of the material. It's heartening to see articles like this. I've created many expressions of my ideas on this in code over the years: Brutal.JS, VanillaView, Bang/Good.html and I recently created one that is even simpler and I'm very happy with. It's similar to a unification of these ideas with Custom Elements. You can check it out here: https://github.com/00000o1/-