remake
just
remake | just | |
---|---|---|
4 | 167 | |
761 | 17,403 | |
- | - | |
5.1 | 9.0 | |
8 months ago | 3 days ago | |
C | Rust | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 only | Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
remake
- Knit: Making a Better Make
-
Why you should adopt Makefile in all of your projects
Anybody who works with Make should also check out remake, because while Make is useful, it is pretty bad at diagnostics.
-
Do you consider ChromeOS and Android to be distributions of Linux?
While true that the absolute minimum install of alpine linux is gnu free I don't think it's fair to say alpine is gnu free...the build-base meta-package for a basic development environment pulls in gcc, binutils and patch, the default make tool of alpine is a gnu make fork, packages like gettext, octave, bison...are all available in the alpine repositories.
- Proposal to add build graph output to GNU Make
just
-
I stopped worrying and loved Makefiles
I don't like makefiles, but I've been enjoying justfiles: https://github.com/casey/just
- Just a Command Runner
-
Ask HN: Any tool for managing large and variable command lines?
I started using just [0] on my projects and have been very happy so far. It is very similar to make but focused on commands rather than build outputs.
Define your recipes and then you can compose them as needed.
[0] https://github.com/casey/just
-
Ask HN: What software sparks joy when using?
just - https://github.com/casey/just
-
GitHub switched to Docker Compose v2, action needed
Welp there is absolute chaos in that thread -- guess it's not an April Fools joke.
I wonder if relying on CI for anything other than provisioning machines is a mistake -- maybe we should have never moved from doing things from local scripts written in $LANGUAGE.
That said, I'm probably biased since I'm a massive fan of things like `make` and more appropriately for the current age, `just`[0]
[0]: https://github.com/casey/just
-
Which command did you run 1731 days ago?
> When a command has some cognitive requirements I create a script with some ${1:-default} values and I store them all in $PATH enabled local/bin
I would consider using just for this:
https://github.com/casey/just
-
Using Make – writing less Makefile
Your coworker's experience is more principled: Make is a mediocre tool for executing commands. It wasn't ever designed for that. Although it is pretty common to see what you are mentioning in projects because it doesn't require installing a dependency.
For a repo where an easy to install (single binary) dependency is a non-issue, consider using just. [1] You get `just -l` where you can see all the command available, the ability to use different languages, and overall simpler command writing.
[1] https://github.com/casey/just
-
Show HN: Just.sh – compiler that turns Justfiles into portable shell scripts
This is fantastic, but I'd say that this solution is somewhat in response to this open issue from 2019:
https://github.com/casey/just/issues/429
I really wish just was included as a package in distributions.
-
Sharing Saturday #496
So far, I didn't work on new features at all but on stabilizing the ground for further development: 1. CMake lists and modules were rewritten a lot, now managing builds and their configurations is much lesser pain. 2. Brought in Justfile for regular tasks, and it's great, no less. 3. Linters, formatters, analyzers for almost all the code (except for Janet for now, as because of it being a niche and young technology, it didn't get enough attention yet). 4. ECS stub. Now runtime class doesn't look like a god object. 5. Started writing unit tests which didn't happen with my personal projects before and maybe indicates how serious am I about this one :D 6. Some of previously hardcoded data has been moved to INI files. Now, if I release the game in 10 years, and in 10 more years some eccentric person decides to make a variant of it, it will be slightly simpler.
-
What’s with DevOps engineers using `make` of all things?
i've grown to like this for my personal projects. https://github.com/casey/just
What are some alternatives?
uftrace - Function graph tracer for C/C++/Rust/Python
Task - A task runner / simpler Make alternative written in Go
makefile-visualizer - Visualize the dependency of makefile and related files.
cargo-make - Rust task runner and build tool.
makefile2graph - Creates a graph of dependencies from GNU-Make; Output is a graphiz-dot file or a Gexf-XML file.
cargo-xtask
BUSY - BUSY is a lean, statically typed, cross-platform, easily bootstrappable build system for GCC, CLANG and MSVC inspired by Google GN
Taskfile - Repository for the Taskfile template.
bgraph - BGraph is a tool designed to generate dependencies graphs from Android.bp soong files.
CodeLLDB - A native debugger extension for VSCode based on LLDB
rabs - General purpose imperative build system.
cargo-release - Cargo subcommand `release`: everything about releasing a rust crate.