release-please
magit
release-please | magit | |
---|---|---|
47 | 119 | |
4,227 | 6,382 | |
5.0% | 0.4% | |
8.5 | 9.3 | |
2 days ago | about 12 hours ago | |
TypeScript | Emacs Lisp | |
Apache License 2.0 | GNU General Public License v3.0 only |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
release-please
-
Git commit helper: add emojis to your commits
Using Conventional Commits β as a standard for your commit messages, makes Semantic Versioning π as easy as can be, with tools like Conventional Changelog π Standard Version π and Semantic Release π¦π
-
How to write GIT commit messages
Conventional Commits
-
How to Improve Development Experience of your React Project
We've covered everything about writing well-formatted and structured code without worrying too much about it anymore. The only part we haven't explored yet is linting commit messages. Commitlint will help us here. It allows you to configure any rules you want for the commit message, but we're going to use the Conventional Commits specification, one of the most popular conventions you'll find.
- Release Please
-
TypeScript Boilerplate
Commit Management with Conventional Commits: The Conventional Commits methodology is adopted to maintain a clear and structured record of changes with the help of commitlint.
-
A Gitlab Review Bot Assistant
Validate if the commit titles adhere to the Conventional Commits Specification in Merge requests.
-
Ask HN: Should commit summaries describe the change, or the intent?
Check out https://www.conventionalcommits.org
-
Announcing release-plz v0.3.0
FYI there is already a popular tool that does just this with a very similar name: https://github.com/googleapis/release-please
-
A clean Git history with Git Rebase and Conventional Commits
The feature commit should have a clear defined message - Don't re-invent here - There exists a fairly used and accepted convention called Conventional Commits, so we are going to use that.
magit
-
M-X Reloaded: The Second Golden Age of Emacs β (Think)
Then the slowness that you're seeing is probably Windows-specific, and that's why everyone else is telling you that Magit is actually fast.
WSL might make things faster.[1] IIUC, the problem is that starting new processes is much slower on Windows than on Linux/Unix and Magit relies heavily on that. This seems to have plagued Git tooling more generally but maybe this got fixed since then.[2]
[1] https://emacs.stackexchange.com/a/58444
[2] https://github.com/magit/magit/issues/2395#issuecomment-1710...
- I (kind of) killed Mercurial at Mozilla
-
Is it too late to learn emacs as a vim lifer?
You'll want to invest the time in learning Magit, which will change your life once you get the hang of it (and I was a heavy user of Fugitive in Vim previously!), and it's unlikely you'll find a better integration with GDB anywhere else on the planet than with Emacs, though I can't say that empirically. You just need to take the plunge and start learning it, then cut over and take the hit in productivity one day when you're feeling adventurous. You'll ultimately become far more powerful than you've ever been. Especially if you delve into elisp over time. I use Spacemacs, which is bloated and has bugs, but it has so many features that I haven't undertaken the massive endeavor to replace it from scratch yet.
-
On Desktop GUI Minimalism
> Even in this article just a few sentences after stating we should start from first principles he then jumps into the assumption of the "desktop".
Agree. Although I can see how the idea of "first principles" can be a very difficult starting point. A blank sheet of paper is a scary monster.
There's a huge breadth and depth of non-"desktop" GUIs out there, some (like smartphones) are even wildly successful. It's good to explore them for inspiration. Some of my favourites:
- Arcan (https://arcan-fe.com/about/) - I won't attempt to summarize, just dive in!
- SailfishOS (https://sailfishos.org/) - mobile UI focused on interaction through gestures / swipes; I've used it as my daily driver for a couple years.
- Speaking of mobiles, classic Nokia UIs allowed you to navigate to a specific item in the menu by pressing the corresponding digit on the dial pad. Once you learned where a particular item is, accessing e.g. your SMS inbox was extremely quick.
- Apple Watch / WatchOS (https://www.apple.com/watchos/) - I've always loved the idea of a device where one of the primary interaction methods was a wheel/dial of some sort. The watch even gives you context-sensitive tactile feedback.
- ZUIs in general (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zooming_user_interface) and the work of Jef Raskin in particular: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archy_(software) - this is the guy who helped design the Macintosh, but his other work took a radically different route.
- Magit (https://magit.vc/). Many common git operations are reduced to a couple of keystrokes; the obscure features are more discoverable, and the cumbersome procedures (such as rebasing, or staging individual hunks) become simple and intuitive. Also check out transient (https://github.com/magit/transient), which is the "UI toolkit" that powers Magit.
-
Not trying to start a rumble, but why emacs
This can be done most comfortably with org-mode in emacs. It offers a lot of features, and they all operate on plain text. There are also nice integrations for git and languagetool, but I guess those are less exclusive.
-
Introducing Consult-GH
How does this differ from https://magit.vc/ ?
- Magit
-
Warp is a modern, Rust-based terminal with AI built in
I would rather see innovative tools that lessen our dependency on 50+ year old tech. This is still a glorified teletype. It uses AI to autosuggest git commands? Contrast with Magit[1], which (while it has a tiny bit of a learning curve, but also nowhere near 23M in funding) actually makes interacting with git a pleasure.
[1]: https://magit.vc
-
A warning to always remember that Obsidian Sync is potentially dangerous
Also was using Emacs (org-mode)[https://orgmode.org] for years with (Magit)[https://magit.vc] package for git. I feel org-mod is a precursor to Roam Research, Obsidian, et al. Hit the spot for years but I wanted editing on mobile so thatβs why Iβm here. :)
What are some alternatives?
semantic-pull-requests - :robot: Let the robots take care of the semantic versioning
vim-fugitive - fugitive.vim: A Git wrapper so awesome, it should be illegal
gitflow - Git extensions to provide high-level repository operations for Vincent Driessen's branching model.
lazygit - simple terminal UI for git commands
cz-cli - The commitizen command line utility. #BlackLivesMatter
doom-emacs - An Emacs framework for the stubborn martian hacker [Moved to: https://github.com/doomemacs/doomemacs]
commitizen - Create committing rules for projects :rocket: auto bump versions :arrow_up: and auto changelog generation :open_file_folder:
code-review - Code Reviews in Emacs
conventional-changelog - Generate changelogs and release notes from a project's commit messages and metadata.
gitui - Blazing π₯ fast terminal-ui for git written in rust π¦
semantic-release - :package::rocket: Fully automated version management and package publishing
emacs-ng - A new approach to Emacs - Including TypeScript, Threading, Async I/O, and WebRender.