refact VS supercharger

With over 1.3k stars on GitHub, more than 40k downloads and installs on both VS Code and JetBrains IDEs, and more than 50 positive reviews, it is worth saying that Refact is part of the best product in the AI coding assistant market.

On vscode i sometimes use continue.dev and refact.ai just for fun and they are great!

Refact was made for this: https://github.com/smallcloudai/refact

You should check-out [refact.ai](https://github.com/smallcloudai/refact). It has both autocomplete and chat. It's in active development, with lots of new features coming soon (context search, fine-tuning for larger models, etc)

I don’t recommend that, since that uses the cloud for the actual inference by default (and they provide no guidance for changing that).

I don’t consider cloud inference to count as getting it working “locally” as requested by the comment above yours.

Refact works nicely and works locally, but the challenge with any new model is making it be supported by the existing software: https://github.com/smallcloudai/refact/

Previously, we used Astro for our refact.ai website and wanted to stay within the Astro ecosystem for the documentation.

Refact LLM can be easily integrated into existing developers workflows with an open-source docker container and VS Code and JetBrains plugins. With Refact's intuitive user interface, developers can utilize the model easily for a variety of coding tasks. Finetune is available in the self-hosting (docker) and Enterprise versions, making suggestions more relevant for your private codebase.

Since I've been on a AI code-helper kick recently. According to the post, Claude 2 now 71.2%, a significant upgrade from 1.3 (56.0%). It isn't specified whether this is pass@1 or pass@10.

For comparison:

* GPT-4 claims 85.4 on HumanEval, in a recent paper https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.11366.pdf GPT-4 was tested at 80.1 pass@1 and 91 pass@1 using their Reflexion technique. They also include MBPP and Leetcode Hard benchmark comparisons

* WizardCoder, a StarCoder fine-tune is one of the top open models, scoring a 57.3 pass@1, model card here: https://huggingface.co/WizardLM/WizardCoder-15B-V1.0

* The best open model I know of atm is replit-code-instruct-glaive, a replit-code-3b fine tune, which scores a 63.5% pass@1. An independent developer abacaj has reproduced that announcement as part of code-eval, a repo for getting human-eval results: https://github.com/abacaj/code-eval

Those interested in this area may also want to take a look at this repo https://github.com/my-other-github-account/llm-humaneval-ben... that also ranks with Eval+, the CanAiCode Leaderboard https://huggingface.co/spaces/mike-ravkine/can-ai-code-resul... and airate https://github.com/catid/supercharger/tree/main/airate

Also, as with all LLM evals, to be taken with a grain of salt...

Liu, Jiawei, Chunqiu Steven Xia, Yuyao Wang, and Lingming Zhang. “Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generation.” arXiv, June 12, 2023. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.01210.

Leverage locally-hosted Large Language Models to write software + unit tests (https://github.com/catid/supercharger)

supercharger Write Software + unit tests for you, based on Baize-30B 8bit, using model parallelism

Added support for 65B LLaMa model to https://github.com/catid/supercharger tonight. It runs faster than Baize 30B (maybe due to lack of adapter) and only slightly slower than Galpaca 30B. Benchmarks here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TYBNr_UPJ7wCzJThuk5ysje7K1x-_62JhBeXDbmrjA8/edit?usp=sharing

Here's the code that loads it: https://github.com/catid/supercharger/blob/main/server/model_koala.py