refact VS llama-cpp-python

With over 1.3k stars on GitHub, more than 40k downloads and installs on both VS Code and JetBrains IDEs, and more than 50 positive reviews, it is worth saying that Refact is part of the best product in the AI coding assistant market.

On vscode i sometimes use continue.dev and refact.ai just for fun and they are great!

Refact was made for this: https://github.com/smallcloudai/refact

You should check-out [refact.ai](https://github.com/smallcloudai/refact). It has both autocomplete and chat. It's in active development, with lots of new features coming soon (context search, fine-tuning for larger models, etc)

I don’t recommend that, since that uses the cloud for the actual inference by default (and they provide no guidance for changing that).

I don’t consider cloud inference to count as getting it working “locally” as requested by the comment above yours.

Refact works nicely and works locally, but the challenge with any new model is making it be supported by the existing software: https://github.com/smallcloudai/refact/

Previously, we used Astro for our refact.ai website and wanted to stay within the Astro ecosystem for the documentation.

Refact LLM can be easily integrated into existing developers workflows with an open-source docker container and VS Code and JetBrains plugins. With Refact's intuitive user interface, developers can utilize the model easily for a variety of coding tasks. Finetune is available in the self-hosting (docker) and Enterprise versions, making suggestions more relevant for your private codebase.

There's a Python binding for llama.cpp which is actively maintained and has worked well for me: https://github.com/abetlen/llama-cpp-python

I'll share the core bit that took a while to figure out the right format, my main script is a hot mess using embeddings with SentenceTransformer, so I won't share that yet. E.g: last night I did a PR for llama-cpp-python that shows how Phi might be used with JSON only for the author to write almost exactly the same code at pretty much the same time. https://github.com/abetlen/llama-cpp-python/pull/1184

Python Bindings for llama.cpp

If the model could be made to work with llama.cpp, then https://github.com/abetlen/llama-cpp-python might be more compact. llama.cpp only supports a limited list of model types though.

https://github.com/abetlen/llama-cpp-python has a web server mode that replicates openai's API iirc and the readme shows it has docker builds already.

LocalAI https://localai.io/ and LMStudio https://lmstudio.ai/ both have fairly complete OpenAI compatibility layers. llama-cpp-python has a FastAPI server as well: https://github.com/abetlen/llama-cpp-python/blob/main/llama_... (as of this moment it hasn't merged GGUF update yet though)

I went with Python, llama-cpp-python, since my goal is just to get a small project up and running locally.