redux-persist VS tape

Storage: redux-persist, @react-native-async-storage/async-storage

Next, following their official document, I added some changes to my store.

redux-persist : For persisting data locally

One thing to keep in mind with persisting data to a device is that you maybe have to run migrations on that data if your app starts to use that data differently. https://github.com/rt2zz/redux-persist/blob/master/docs/migrations.md

for most applications, AsyncStorage works fine. also, you can use it with redux-persist or persist middleware of zustand. in this way, you won't even need to touch the AsyncStorage. my first choice as a database (or just a persistor tool) is zustand and AsyncStorage. this combination can solve storage issues most of the time.

That is also admittedly not very smart. Maybe you only want to persist certain slices, maybe you need to do other things with it. That's why https://github.com/rt2zz/redux-persist and other similar addons exist.

Last but not least important are ava, uvu and tape; they are a really light and fast test runners.

A more minimalist approach is this tape module and the TAP protocol. https://www.npmjs.com/package/tape

OK will do. Do you have any tips on finding a suitable project? Ideally I was hoping to to contribute to a piece of software that I actually use/know/like/want to improve. Given that, and my area of expertise, I had shortlisted Signal Desktop, and Tape.

Reactjs I have the following components: // Hello.jsexport default (React) => ({name}) => { return ( Hello {name ? name : 'Stranger'}! )}// App.jsimport createHello from './Hello'export default (React) => () => { const Hello = createHello(React) const helloProps = { name: 'Jane' } return ( )}// index.jsimport React from 'react'import { render } from 'react-dom'import createApp from './App'const App = createApp(React)render( , document.getElementById('app')) And I want to set up a test to see if the App component contains one Hello component. I tried the following, using Tape and Enzyme: import createApp from './App'import React from 'react'import test from 'tape'import { shallow } from 'enzyme'test('App component test', (assert) => { const App = createApp(React) const wrapper = shallow() assert.equal(wrapper.find('Hello').length === 1, true)}) But the result was that the length property of the find result was equal to 0, when I was expecting it to be equal to 1. So, how do I find my Hello component? Answer link : https://codehunter.cc/a/reactjs/find-component-by-display-name-when-the-component-is-stateless-functional-with-enzyme

For us at Begin and Architect, tape has been in use for several years. tape has a stable and straightforward API, routine maintenance updates, and outputs TAP, making it really versatile. While TAP is legible, it's not the most human-readable format. Fortunately, several TAP reporters can help display results for developers. Until recently, Begin's TAP reporter of choice was tap-spec. Sadly tap-spec wasn't kept up to date and npm began reporting vulnerabilities.

I really enjoy Ava [1] or anything assert-tape-like [2]. "uvu" [3] is getting a lot of love lately, but it's very feature limited and much of it's touted advantages are at the detriment to feature set.

[1] https://github.com/avajs/ava

[2] https://github.com/substack/tape

[3] https://github.com/lukeed/uvu

Jest is great for front-end (or full stack integration) testing, but I feel it's specialized for that use-case and doesn't always play nice with backend/middle-tier testing needs.

-Jest -React testing library -Enzyme -Sinon -Mocha -Chai -AVA -Tape

Tape