redux-essentials-example-app VS joystick

You're right, it is related. But I think that Flux- and ELM-like architectures are making it even worse by forcing any "external" interaction to became the gap. Look how they suffer when it comes to executing any async operation like network request. Initially we have this relatively simple framework, but then we had to add "Middleware" to just run network request (which is a good example of the Remainder issue). I love the idea behind these architectures, which makes logic more predictable and testing way easier. I even was using them by myself. But now they looks like something turned inside out for me. I believe we could do better. I'm finishing my proposal right now. It will take couple more weeks to edit and translate it, but soon I'll show what I mean.

Hi, I maintain Redux and wrote most of our docs (including our current tutorials).

Can you give some details on which parts of our docs you feel are "incomprehensible"? I'm curious which specific pages you've been looking at, and for what purpose.

We've tried to organize the docs using the "Documentation System" approach described at [0]: Tutorials for teaching step-by-step, Explanations and How-To guides for specific topics, and References for API details.

Generally we want people to go through our "Redux Essentials" tutorial [1] as the primary way to learn how to use Redux correctly. It teaches "modern Redux" patterns with Redux Toolkit as the standard way to write Redux logic (including RTK Query for handling data fetching), and React-Redux hooks in components.

I'm genuinely interested in feedback on what explanations aren't clear and how we can improve things!

[0] https://documentation.divio.com/

[1] https://redux.js.org/tutorials/essentials/part-1-overview-co...

https://redux.js.org/tutorials/essentials/part-1-overview-concepts (covers how to use Redux Toolkit and RTK Query)

I built a full-stack JS framework [1] that I thought would be a hit. As best as I can tell, because it lacks the complexity/word salad of existing solutions, it's mostly been ignored despite being (imo) an elegant solution to a long-standing problem.

[1] https://cheatcode.co/joystick

SEEKING WORK, Tennessee, United States

Remote: Yes

I'm a full-stack, JavaScript/Node.js developer and designer. I'm the creator of the Joystick JavaScript framework [1], Push deployment service [2], and Mod CSS framework [3].

I also have experience with MongoDB, PostgreSQL, and MariaDB (limited but competent) and devops (K8s + Docker and bare-metal linux admin, the latter preferred for simplicity/stability).

Currently looking to take on clients who are open to using Joystick, Push, and Mod to design and develop their app. Because it's still at a pre-release version, I'm willing to work out deals around pricing to get some more test-cases under my belt. Ideal client is a solopreneur w/ funding or entrepreneur with previous experience + funding. Open to working with startups (early or established), but only on greenfield projects where use of Joystick is ok.

Email: [email protected].

[1] https://cheatcode.co/joystick

[2] https://cheatcode.com/push

[3] https://cheatcode.co/mod

There is. I was frustrated by all of the chaos and built a solution [1]. Not too far of from an RC1 and then a 1.0 (which is being done slowly so I can freeze APIs and avoid the typical JS rug pulls).

[1] https://github.com/cheatcode/joystick

I've been (slowly) writing a new type of OSS license around this exact concept so it's easier to (legally) stop LLMs hoovering up IP [1] (under "derivative works not permitted").

[1] https://github.com/cheatcode/joystick/blob/development/LICEN...

Joystick [1] will let you go. No Stockholm syndrome. No lotion in the basket.

[1] https://github.com/cheatcode/joystick