react-test VS web.dev

https://react-test.dev/ eloquent testing for react components

I have an unfinished side project called Documentation Page:

https://documentation.page/

It's "unfinished" because I'd need to integrate payments and do all the accounting on my side (non-trivial as an individual living in Japan), but otherwise it's worked pretty well for my own projects.

It parses your Github Repo (according to https://documentation.page/documentation#getting-started) to generate the website. It can be a single readme.md file (for smaller projects), a folder called "documentation", or you can configure it otherwise. Some examples hosted by Documentation Page:

- statux.dev: simple single-page docs and website, menu config in https://github.com/franciscop/statux/blob/master/documentati.... Similar to form-mate.dev & vector-graph.com

- react-test.dev: split into multiple pages, you specify the folder and it'll automatically merge the markdown files. See config https://github.com/franciscop/react-test/blob/master/documen...

- crossroad.page: has an landing page, but that is not officially supported (yet). See the configs in https://github.com/franciscop/crossroad/blob/master/document...

Before we start creating pages in our application, it's important to understand how Next.js renders content. The framework supports multiple rendering methods including server-side rendering (SSR), static site rendering (SSG), and client-side rendering (CSR). There are many pros and cons to each rendering method (too many to cover in this post) so if these concepts are new to you, Google’s web.dev site has a very good introduction to rendering on the web that can help you understand rendering options.

The lifecycle of an interaction. Source: web.dev

Probably not, it's the CSS used so far, so if there are elements you've not interacted with, that's an issue. This web.dev article gives some tools you can use https://web.dev/articles/extract-critical-css

I noticed the same for Google's site https://web.dev/

The last article pushed to the feed was "Changes to the web.dev infrastructure" few months ago https://web.dev/blog/webdev-migration

The feed still there but with no updates https://web.dev/feed.xml and on the site you can see new articles published.

Is sad that on a infrastructure revamp of a modern site, the RSS feed was left out of the features list (at least for now).

Upon testing on Firefox and Mi Browser, there was no triggering of the BeforeInstallPrompt event, as expected. However, I noticed that web.dev manages to display a prompt on these browsers, even though they theoretically lack support for the BeforeInstallPrompt event.

web.dev, maintained by Google, including posts by Chrome developers and their co-workers,

In a old web.dev articleI came across the word "Incremental (Re)Hydration" which is linked to a Glimmer.js-Blog post (also called "Incremental Rendering" there) confuses me. Is Incremental (Re)Hydration the same as Progressive (Re)Hydration? Reading the Glimmer-Blog article it seems so, but in the web.devarticle it seems to be something different.

Web.dev newsletter - though it's not a weekly newsletter and it's only content from web.dev (though really high quality content)

Just open up a text edi web developers are self-taught. a website. That's what I did. Some people like this: https://web.dev