react-chartjs-2 VS react-i18next

Chart JS is a great choice for creating charts as it has multiple visualizations. There are different integrations for the JS frameworks, and we shall use react-chart-js-2 library for Next JS.

React Chartjs 2 - Visit react-chartjs-2.js.org for more information. React Chartjs 2 is a React wrapper for Chart.js, a popular JavaScript charting library. It provides an easy way to integrate Chart.js into your React applications, allowing you to create a variety of charts and graphs with the underlying features of Chart.js.

Website: react-chartjs-2 GitHub page

If you’ve heard of Chart.js, you might wonder what React-chartjs-2 is all about. Well, think of it as a handy tool for using Chart.js within your React projects. Chart.js is a JavaScript library that helps create various types of interactive charts using HTML5 Canvas.

React Charts js

I'm currently using chart-js react-chartjs-2 it's ok but just wondering what else people could recommend for speed of implementation.

An example of a Snowflake API request using JavaScript, React, and Chart.js. This example uses react-chartjs-2, a wrapper for Chart.js. Install the dependencies:

React ChartJs 2 is a wrapper for the Chart.js library, which is a Javascript chart library used to build chart components with the HTML5 canvas element. In addition, Chart.js features can be used in React ChartJs 2. To get the most out of React ChartJs 2, you need to be familiar with Chart.js docs.

In the frontend, we decided to display the analytics data via a graph using the react-chartjs-2 library. React-chartjs-2 is a React wrapper for chartjs, a popular charting library for JavaScript. This library is simple, beginner friendly, maintainable, and flexible. It has a large community of users and thorough documentation. This provides for quick execution with the library. We also implemented the dashboard UI flexibly, so that any historical data point could be selected and displayed as requirements change in the future.

> It’s important to be aware of what you are getting if you go with React, and what you are getting is a far cry from what a framework would offer, with all the corresponding pros and cons.

Would you like to elaborate on that?

In my experience, with something as great, size/ecosystem-wise as React, there will almost always be at least one "mainstream" package for whatever you might want to do with it, that integrates pretty well. Where a lot of things might come out of the box with a framework, with a library I often find myself just needing to install the "right" package, and from there it's pretty much the same.

For example, using https://angular.io/guide/i18n-overview or installing and using https://react.i18next.com/

Or something like https://angular.io/guide/form-validation out of the box, vs installing and using https://formik.org/

Or perhaps https://angular.io/guide/router vs https://reactrouter.com/en/main

Even adding something that's not there out of the box is pretty much the same, like https://primeng.org/ or https://primereact.org/

React will typically have more fragmentation and therefore also choice, but I don't see those two experiences as that different. Updates and version management/supply chain will inevitably be more of a mess with the library, admittedly.

Now, projects like Next https://nextjs.org/ exist and add what some might regard as the missing pieces and work well if you want something opinionated and with lots of features out of the box, but a lot of those features (like SSR) are actually pretty advanced and not always even necessary.

In a recent project I've been using react-i18next so I'll use its syntax for the examples, but pretty much every library works similarly.

react-i18next

i18next - You can find documentation and resources for using i18next at react.i18next.com. i18next is a popular internationalization framework for JavaScript, including React. It provides a comprehensive solution for handling translations, formatting, and more.

So far, we’ve been using a utility createLocalizedString to create and use the LocalizedString type. This utility is only really practical in unit tests. For real applications, we’ll want to use a translation function from react-i18next or next-i18next to do the heavy lifting. Then we just wrap the translation functions that are provided in order to use our type:

Website: https://react.i18next.com/

If you are talking about handling translations for your application, take a look at https://react.i18next.com/

I will be supporting Korean as a part of the beta. I have to look deeper into https://react.i18next.com/ in order to understand what it provides. My goal is for engineers to be able to click a single button and have localizations always up to date in their codebase, not delaying shipping a new version or having to even think about it.

With the new react-i18next version, when loading multiple namespaces, t function will infer and accept the keys for the first namespace. So this pattern is now accepted:

react-i18next