linux VS nixpkgs

Fan control generally involves hysteresis. This means a cooling fan turns on at one temperature, and then turns off once temperature has fallen to another lower temperature. This avoids cycling the fan on and off too much. The difference between those two temperatures is hysteresis. The default hysteresis is 10°C and maybe the fan never manages to cool the CPU to 45°C. A parameter has been added to change hysteresis: https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/commit/fa390133fd17f2cc6aa5a7d2e472c073a1115fe1

I see that the PR against the Raspberry Pi linux repo is out [0]. Interestingly they are introducing a BCM2712 defconfig with a 64k default page size.

[0] - https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/pull/5618

and can grab their patched kernel source here ( use the dtbs and overlays and kernel from your compiled version)

Also was your pi issue related to this? https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/3381 or what do you mean jittery, unstable?

Could be related to the driver load order/blacklisting (https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/435) Or couple of people report configuring the dtoverlay=imx477 in the boot config helped (https://raw.githubusercontent.com/raspberrypi/firmware/master/boot/overlays/README)

thanks, I also found this: https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/5398

And ready! :)

> It is the most basic task for Linux computer...

Well, it depends for whom. Also, you need adequate software and hardware. About wireless, the chipset in an RPi4 is designed for clients, not APs, and its capabilities on having multiple clients are quite limited:

https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/3010

Routers like the Omnia Turris, Mikrotik, PC Engines... use specific mini PCIe cards that can be as expensive as a full Raspberry Pi 4, just for the wireless.

https://www.discomp.eu/wireless-minipci-cards_c14501412.html

This will drop you into a shell where `tracexec` is installed.

[1]: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/310158

I don't think so. The article is probably intended for the Nix community, so the author doesn't need to convince HN that something is going on. If as an outsider you are interested then you need to look into it yourself, the community has no obligation to make their internal conflicts legible to the outside world.

As an outsider myself, it certainly looks like something is going on as more than 20 Nixpkg maintainers left in a week: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues?q=label%3A%228.has%3...

https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commits?author=neon-sunset

I see two signers in the top 6 displayed on https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/graphs/contributors

For a single file script, nix can make the package management quite easy: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/doc/languages-f...

For example,

```

Yes, Nix doesn't actually ensure that the builds are deterministic. In fact it works just fine if they aren't. There are packages in nixpkgs that aren't reproducible: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aiss...

I'm not familiar with Bazel, but Nix in it's current form wouldn't have solved this attack. First of all, the standard mkDerivation function calls the same configure; make; make install process that made this attack possible. Nixpkgs regularly pulls in external resources (fetchUrl and friends) that are equally vulnerable to a poisoned release tarball. Checkout the comment on the current xz entry in nixpkgs https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/pkgs/tools/comp...

NixOS uses a monorepo and I think everyone's love it.

I love being able to easily grep through all the packages source code and there's regularly PRs that harmonizes conventions across many packages.

Nixpkgs doesn't include the packaged software source code, so it's a lot more practical than what Debian is doing.

https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs