rain VS circuitbreaker

I use put.io. It downloads and seeds, converts, streams, finds subtitles, allows for you to download the file if you want.

[0]: https://put.io

Put.io: Cheap per-day plan, plus other options. Worth it for storage and instant media access.

I could understand it, if it came with some kind of cloud space, where I could put my stuff, and whatch it from there (like put.io does), put my local stuff? LOL.

Thanks. Those are just for managing a the torrent client though. What about being able to selectively download files from a shared seed box over HTTPS? I want to be able to pick and choose the things I download, so rsync/rclone aren't that suitable. I use aria2 with put.io's web interface at the moment and it works really well.

I'm fairly new to Swift, i'm looking for some help. I'm building a movie application which fetches content from an API and eventually stream movies via put.io. I'm facing an issue with displaying each movie view when tapped into a custom sheet BottomSheet.

r/nanocurrency is where most of us Nano enthusiasts hang out, so feel free to join there and ask any questions, or you can DM/reply to me personally. If you want to see what Nano payments look like on a website, put.io has the accept-nano gateway implemented, while there are many other websites with Nano payments integrated listed here.

I don't believe it is put.io causing my issues. If I did not process the files, and had them sent straight back to the download folder configured in the Black Hole, it would be approx. 5-10mins, and another release of the same quality would not be downloaded.

I am trying to mount put.io using rClone on Windows 10.

Unfortunately not. Since put.io is a Turkish company it was affected by PayPal seizing all operations in Turkey in 2016.

Circuit Breaker v0.3.1 (Released: 25th July 2022) - https://github.com/lightningequipment/circuitbreaker/tags

A lightning 'firewall' to avoid griefing attacks (see Github repo, and Bitcoin Magazine article). Alpha quality so should be as an option, not in main guide yet.

In the case depicted in Fig-2, our routing node is directly connected to the custodial service. This is ideal to optimize the attack: the deposits have no cost, HTLCs will settle quickly, and we avoid the limitations set by other routing nodes using CircuitBreaker (payments fail when a few HTLCs are pending). If the attack is successful, having a lot of inbound liquidity from other nodes is key. The channel to the custodial service will quickly become unusable as we have stolen the liquidity to our side. Therefore, you want to desuturate it by circular rebalancing. Once we free up inbound liquidity from the custodial service, the channels to our liquidity providers will be saturated, we can chose to close those and move the profits on-chain or we could loop out (not sure which process is less costly: we are making free BTC, does it even matter?)

That's old news from last year. Already been addressed: https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/pull/4527 https://github.com/lightningequipment/circuitbreaker

The nano shiller proceeds with more FUD: "Ya but LN has many security issues, there is the famous flood & loot attack, you should google it". What the nano shillers either don't know, or as I would expect from them, consciously omit is that we already have a sort of "firewall" for this attack and this problem has been fixed. I suspect consciously because they always claim bitcoin is not scalable when this is obviously false and they know that too.

Ah ok I misunderstood your question then. The third option is what i use also. For your 4th option take a look at https://github.com/lightningequipment/circuitbreaker where an hold fee for an htlc was discussed. The base fee part could probably be used as you suggest as fourth option but I do not think something like this is implemented anywhere yet.

1) Flood & Loot attacks have been fixed. Source 1 & Source 2.

And here https://github.com/lightningequipment/circuitbreaker