quickjspp VS proposal-logical-assignment

I think that my Storage implementation that is built-in into JavaScript in QuickJS and Sciter is still unbeatable as an integrated JS Storage solution:

"custom version of React he publishes..."

It is not a a custom version of React but rather extension of DOM model by just these:

1. Native JSX support. In Sciter QuickJS was extended to support JSX literals out of the box: https://github.com/c-smile/quickjspp/blob/master/quickjs-jsx...

2. Native methods:

   - Element.patch(...JSX expression...) - native VDOM reconciliation implementation.

In fact 1.8 Mb is quite a lot for QuickJS.

Whole Sciter engine that includes as QuickJS as HTML/CSS engines is about 6 Mb.

My port of QuickJS [1] that also includes persistent storage (think of MongoDB built into JS) is 736 Kb on Windows.

[1] https://github.com/c-smile/quickjspp

I've added built-in persistence to QuickJS: https://github.com/c-smile/quickjspp/blob/master/storage/doc/introduction.md

I might go a little offtopic here. Any plans to integrate https://github.com/c-smile/quickjspp. That way you can target mobile platforms too. QT supports mobiles well

As for desktop only this is great. Great work. Many people are commenting on NodeGUI only. They have forgotten to mention how Svelte also contribytes to saving memory footprint and cpu cycles over other frameworks with a much easier way to write apps. Add a small learning curve to that.

I've added JSX to JS used in Sciter that allowed to have JSX available for Mithril and PReact

Part of ES2021: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-logical-assignment

- &&=

And don't forget the strife around the Python "walrus operator" := [2]

[0] https://node.green/

[1] https://github.com/tc39/proposal-logical-assignment/

[2] https://realpython.com/python-walrus-operator/

Logical Assignment Operators

📙 Proposal

If you click thru to the linked TC39 proposal [1], you will find that the site author is also one of its "Champion"s - so you know makes sense they would be stoked about it.

Also, personally I find MDN content somehow unnecessarily dense, especially for beginners, and actually appreciate this kind of content. YMMV.

[1] https://github.com/tc39/proposal-logical-assignment

This this comment/discussion for more reasoning why deviating from this was deemed advantageous.

Logical assignment (&&=, ||=, ??=)

Am I the only one who finds the comment confusing? According to the proposal, I think the better explanation would be: "assign b to a only when a is nullish" (considering that the value of b is assigned to a) .

Yeah, that's it. You can check out more details in the (proposal document)[https://github.com/tc39/proposal-logical-assignment/].