quick-patch vs woo

quick-patch

Easily override quicklisp projects without using git submodules (by tdrhq)

Suggest topics

Source Code

Suggest alternative

Edit details

woo

A fast non-blocking HTTP server on top of libev (by fukamachi)

common-lisp Webserver

Source Code

ultra.wikia.com

Suggest alternative

Edit details

Our great sponsors

WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS

InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale

SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews

Our great sponsors

quick-patch		woo
	Project
4	Mentions	15
20	Stars	1,253
-	Growth	-
0.0	Activity	5.6
about 1 year ago	Latest Commit	4 months ago
Common Lisp	Language	Common Lisp
Mozilla Public License 2.0	License	MIT License

The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

quick-patch

Posts with mentions or reviews of quick-patch. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-05-30.

Common Lisp package/project manager for downloading dependencies recursively
4 projects | /r/lisp | 30 May 2023

This looks nice: https://github.com/tdrhq/quick-patch/
Why Turtl Switched from Common Lisp to JavaScript
6 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 27 Oct 2021

On this:
> I don’t have to deal with quicklisp’s “all or nothing” packaging that doesn’t support version pinning.
it's easy to clone a given version on quicklisp's local-projects, but we also have Qlot and the emerging CLPM. See also the new https://github.com/tdrhq/quick-patch/
tdrhq/quick-patch: Easily override quicklisp projects without using git submodules
1 project | /r/lisp | 8 Aug 2021

1 project | /r/Common_Lisp | 8 Aug 2021

woo

Posts with mentions or reviews of woo. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-01-10.

Learn Lisp the Hard Way
5 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 10 Jan 2023
Algorithms and data structures implemented in many programming languages
5 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 23 Sep 2022
Woo: A fast non-blocking HTTP server on top of libev
1 project | news.ycombinator.com | 8 Sep 2022

1 project | news.ycombinator.com | 11 Jul 2022
Lisp can be Hard Real Time [pdf]
2 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 25 Aug 2022
Help starting woo server
3 projects | /r/lisp | 19 Jul 2022

Can I ask you this though? Again, all I have in my file is what's under the "Start a server" section of the woo readme.
Does the Haskell client for Selenium still work?
7 projects | /r/haskell | 29 Jun 2022

For example, let's look at this project: https://github.com/fukamachi/woo
Struggling as a junior web developer
1 project | /r/learnprogramming | 20 Jun 2022

One of the nice things about Common Lisp is that it also has the fastest web server: https://github.com/fukamachi/woo
V Language Review (2022)
8 projects | /r/programming | 19 Jun 2022

Here you have a web server written in Chez Scheme: https://github.com/guenchi/Igropyr So you see that Lisp is very suitable for web applications. Another project that proves that Lisp is excellent for web servers is Woo: https://github.com/fukamachi/woo
Is Woo still "beta quality" or prod ready?
7 projects | /r/lisp | 3 Jun 2022

I remember a long time ago when I checked out woo https://github.com/fukamachi/woo it still had the same warning "This software is still BETA quality." Is that really still the case? As of now, I'm seeing the last update was only 4 days ago, so it looks like it's been worked on relatively actively this whole time.