quick-patch VS protohackers-cl

Compare quick-patch vs protohackers-cl and see what are their differences.

quick-patch

Easily override quicklisp projects without using git submodules (by tdrhq)

protohackers-cl

Protohackers solutions in Common Lisp (by bo-tato)
Our great sponsors
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
quick-patch protohackers-cl
4 1
20 2
- -
0.0 3.2
about 1 year ago 11 months ago
Common Lisp Common Lisp
Mozilla Public License 2.0 -
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

quick-patch

Posts with mentions or reviews of quick-patch. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-05-30.

protohackers-cl

Posts with mentions or reviews of protohackers-cl. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-05-30.
  • Common Lisp package/project manager for downloading dependencies recursively
    4 projects | /r/lisp | 30 May 2023
    I'm a beginner with lisp and guix but recently I used guix to manage dependencies for a lisp project, and it worked well. I had to write a few package definitions for packages that were newer than the version in the main guix channel or not in guix. A project I'd like to do is add support for quicklisp and utralisp to guix import, so you don't have to manually write packages. I think guile scheme is just using guix and doesn't have another dependency management tool. It could be good for CL, it solves some problems that quicklisp doesn't, around security (has signatures and hashes it verifies), and versioning (can have multiple versions of same library), along with solving non-lisp related dependencies, ie some lisp library maybe depends on certain version of zlib or some other native library.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing quick-patch and protohackers-cl you can also consider the following projects:

woo - A fast non-blocking HTTP server on top of libev

arrow-macros

wookie - Asynchronous HTTP server in common lisp

download-dependencies - A simple utility to download dependencies recursively