python-c-io_uring-example VS io_uring-echo-server

Compare python-c-io_uring-example vs io_uring-echo-server and see what are their differences.

python-c-io_uring-example

Using io_uring Linux Kernel interface from Python by JITing C code with MetaCall. (by metacall)
Python C FFI iteroperability liburing io-uring JIT
Source Code
Suggest alternative
Edit details

io_uring-echo-server

io_uring echo server (by frevib)
io-uring event-loop async-io
Source Code
Suggest alternative
Edit details
WorkOS
Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
Our great sponsors
python-c-io_uring-example io_uring-echo-server
4 1
25 358
- -
0.0 3.6
over 2 years ago 3 months ago
C C
Apache License 2.0 MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

python-c-io_uring-example

Posts with mentions or reviews of python-c-io_uring-example. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-01-26.

io_uring-echo-server

Posts with mentions or reviews of io_uring-echo-server. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-03-08.
  • Put an io_uring on it: Exploiting the Linux Kernel
    3 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 8 Mar 2022
    > Network IO discussion: https://github.com/axboe/liburing/issues/536

    I see an issue with a narrative but zero discussion at that link.

    Furthermore, your io_uring benchmark being utilized in that issue isn't even batching CQE consumption. I've submitted a quick and dirty untested PR adding rudimentary batching at [0]. Frankly, what seems to be a constant din of poorly-written benchmarks portraying io_uring in a negative light vs. epoll is getting rather old.

    [0] https://github.com/frevib/io_uring-echo-server/pull/16

What are some alternatives?

When comparing python-c-io_uring-example and io_uring-echo-server you can also consider the following projects:

py-cryptonight - Python Cryptonight binding / extension. Monero hash function, proof-of-work, cn_slow_hash()

rio - pure rust io_uring library, built on libc, thread & async friendly, misuse resistant

kcs - Scripting in C with JIT(x64)/VM.

liburing

MoarVM - A VM with adaptive optimization and JIT compilation, built for Rakudo

kbio - Another Async IO Framework based on io_uring

ravi - Ravi is a dialect of Lua, featuring limited optional static typing, JIT and AOT compilers

io-uring - The `io_uring` library for Rust

tinycc - Unofficial mirror of mob development branch

async_io_uring - An event loop in Zig using io_uring and coroutines

adorad - Fast, Expressive, & High-Performance Programming Language for those who dare

Polyphony - Fine-grained concurrency for Ruby

python-c-io_uring-example vs py-cryptonight io_uring-echo-server vs rio python-c-io_uring-example vs kcs io_uring-echo-server vs liburing python-c-io_uring-example vs MoarVM io_uring-echo-server vs kbio python-c-io_uring-example vs ravi io_uring-echo-server vs io-uring python-c-io_uring-example vs tinycc io_uring-echo-server vs async_io_uring python-c-io_uring-example vs adorad io_uring-echo-server vs Polyphony