pymae VS ASP.NET Core

I wrote a book about Python for Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. Website is here, Github is here, and I send a free pdf copy to students. It is in dirty imperial units, though.

Just gonna drop this: https://github.com/alexkenan/pymae/ GitHub repo with (basic) examples for using Python in mechanical and aerospace engineering

In addition to what the others mentioned (I like Automate the Boring Stuff the most), I wrote a book about the very thing! Python for Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. Website here, github here, and I send a free copy to students!

Sorry to toot my own horn, but I wrote a book specifically for Python for mech/aero engineering. Website is here, and the github repo is here. Did you have any coding classes in school? Usually there are a few.

Check out Python for Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering if you're in mech or aero. I send free copies to students!

Python or Matlab. I'm incredibly biased, and I think Python is better. I wrote a book about it, and I send free copies to students.

You can also take a look through my Github repo for a book that I wrote about Python for mechanical and aerospace engineering. It's not quite related to what you'd be looking for, but it's probably a little closer to how you could use Python in oil & gas than "here's how you can automate report entry" (which still could be useful).

I have some basic mechanical and aerospace engineering examples here. Not sure if that counts as "physics" though. I think anything involving kinematics, energy, and/or forces are fair game!

For anybody reading this thread, I wrote a book about Python for mechanical and aerospace engineering since there was nothing out there. The website link is here and the GitHub repo with all of the finished programs is here.

Please let me know if you end up getting Python integrated into your work. The reason I was invited to speak to NLR is because I wrote a book about Python for mech/aero engineering (website here, github here, but it's really aimed at learning the language. I'm considering trying to get materials together to make a follow-up book that addresses "Great, I've learned the language. Now what?"

This approach to organizing middleware enhances code readability, maintainability, and reusability. By following this encapsulation pattern, you're adhering to best practices in ASP.NET Core development, ensuring your application remains well-organized and scalable.

🌟.NET 9 Preview 2 ➡️.NET 9 Preview 2 Discussion ➡️ASP.NET Core updates in .NET 9 Preview 2 ➡️ASP.NET Core updates in .NET 9 Preview 2 Release Notes ➡️EF Core updates in .NET 9 Preview 2 ➡️.NET Aspire preview 4 - .NET Aspire

https://github.com/dotnet/aspnetcore/issues/50643

Even if you look at Microsoft’s by far most popular GitHub project, they’re still only half as big as SupaBase. If you believe “the SupaBase story”, SupaBase grew and became twice as large as Microsoft in 3 years. Below is their likes over time if you’re curious, together with a couple of additional “too good to be true” Silicon Valley projects.

https://github.com/dotnet/aspnetcore/issues/10117

To achieve these objectives, we will take inspiration from ASP.NET Core Identity's PasswordHasher class. It incorporates a concept of hash versioning, allowing only the number of iterations to be modified.

yes I watched several courses, may be aim not getting clearly. but i worked with asp.net which uses http call and firebase cloud function also which uses socket connection, for socket connection its makes sense to use observable bcoz there streams of data we can observe once the connection establish ,but for http it need to be call every time.

As I'm not utilizing ASP.NET, despite its resource-intensive nature and occasional unpredictability, I prefer the cost-free option. I'm hesitant to invest in EPPlus or engage in trials, and moreover, I am more proficient with Interop. Given the limited volume of records in my department, there's a preference for utilizing tools covered by our existing license. This avoids the need for navigating through layers of approval within the chain of command and ensures compliance with our contractual agreements and Microsoft's patch management, ultimately aligning with a cost-saving mindset.