pushup VS fyne

I think this is adding unnecessary complexity. One of the reasons developers gravitate towards a framework like Alpine or HTMX is to write less JS and go back to enjoying HTML. Of course there are a lot of use cases that require custom JS scripting. But bootstrapping a project with another Go web framework and adding Alpine is also trivial. But keep going and follow your vision. I love these types of projects. Check this one out:

https://pushup.adhoc.dev

It's got some unique ideas.

This strikes me as incredibly clever.

The compiler and code-generation implementation seems equally straightforward and complex, my mind is racing trying to build a mental model of the whole thing.

The code generation comes after a feature-packed parser and "compilation" step. Emitting go source code is nice because subsequent compilation tells you if its valid or not. I'm wondering if there is a specific reason the "framework" source code is emitted via a series of printf calls[0]. A library of go template "fragments" might be easier to manage (and debug).

[0] https://github.com/adhocteam/pushup/blob/0519a782c1c9fc79877...

If you want to look at something a bit bigger I can also suggest looking at Fyne (the toolkit that I’m working on and using to build the app): https://github.com/fyne-io/fyne

Tauri is definitely a hot SEO keyword!

I had not heard of https://wails.io before for Golang GUIs, only https://fyne.io which renders its own controls.

And this is how https://github.com/go-gst/go-gst, https://github.com/go-gl/glfw, and even https://fyne.io/ are using system libraries to propose a lot of functionalities.

It would be great if we could add support for Flatpak portals in https://github.com/fyne-io/fyne but I find the portal documentation complicated (especially if preferring to use D-Bus instead of accessing libportal using C). Does anyone have code examples for using portals from Go code?

If you fancy Go, there's Fyne. I don't work in the space so I cannot judge it.

https://github.com/fyne-io/fyne