purescript-native VS three.js

Before 2012, all of my websites were made using HTML, CSS and a sprinkling of JS. Then, I went all-in on AngularJS, followed by React. I started using Typescript and then PureScript and learned more frameworks like Halogen and Concur. I even wrote my own UI framework called purescript-deku.

PureScript native back-ends manage memory by reference counting too https://github.com/andyarvanitis/purescript-native/blob/cpp/README-cpp.md

I hope you get a chance to try PureScript out in your JS projects! For more learning resources, you can check out PureScript website.

Did you look into purescript-native, the purescript-to-c++ transpiler? Just curious what your reasons were to avoid that option.

Typeclasses are the big one I'd say. User defined operators are missing. Direct foreign function access is missing as well - for js stuff you have to communicate through "ports", you can't call js functions striaght from elm code. Also its not a general purpose language, you can't write a commandline tool with it or compile it to native code.

Another I thought of: Purescript (a haskell-like language that compiles to Javascript) has a native backend that compiles to either C++ or Go.

Purescript. A Haskell like language that is translate to Javascript. You can run it in NodeJS. There is also native versions that translate to Go or C++.

Regarding the optimization of the effect, I found an issue on the three.js GitHub repository: https://github.com/mrdoob/three.js/issues/14104 The alpha channel issue seems to be a difficult problem, which has been present since 2018. At the end of the discussion, a solution proposed by a contributor is not to modify the UnrealBloomPass but to blend the source texture and target texture in the shader.

Here's how we used Three.js to place and find affirmations in the sky.

Three.js is dedicated to generating 3D visuals, offering a powerful suite of features and tools. It is built atop WebGL and optimizes GPU usage for rapid rendering, ensuring smooth performance across devices, including those with limited resources. Three.js's versatility allows for the creation of a vast spectrum of 3D graphics and animations, ranging from simple shapes to intricate models.

7. three.js

Most of frontend libraries are made with Vanilla JS. An example of library that you might frequently use is "Chart.js". But React is not compatible with Chart.js so here it comes "React-chartjs-2" A wrapper library to work with Chart.js in React ecosystem. Oh you want to use "three.js" for some cool 3D? you will need "React-three/fiber". In my case, I need to implement "telegram-web-app", not so fast, I have to create my own wrapper to be able to use it.

For one of my 100-Day Challenges, I chose to dive into Three.js, a JavaScript 3D library. It's easy to start learning, and it becomes difficult to master with the inclusion of shaders.

Nonetheless, it offers nearly infinite possibilities. You can code and create anything, from a mobile app with React Native to a desktop application with Electron.js. Furthermore, JavaScript provides excellent frameworks and libraries that can be applied in various approaches, such as React, Three, Vue, Meteor, and Astro.