pug VS SingleFile

HTML can't be fixed with a small trick like that.

Just use templating engine like Pug and get away with most of the annoyances.

It's concise about what part of the text is covered by a certain tag due to forced indentation and you never write "class=" but are all turned into CSS selector notation and many other tricks.

https://github.com/pugjs/pug#syntax

Unless the HTML I'm composing will be touched by people like designers who would get scared of new syntax, in which case I'll use Twig or Nunjucks, I'll never write plain HTML for myself.

There's also a very solid implementation in PHP as well.

https://github.com/pug-php/pug

Pug is great, and since OP is coding PHP, pug-php might be of interest.

That's interesting. I have been saving articles as PDF files, which is browser-independent, but useful just for search and reference, a nuisance to quote/copy-and-paste.

If I search only the computer, I don't get results from EBay and Amazon at the top. The idea of keeping the knowledge base separate from the primary notes is a good idea. In my case, that knowledge base is the file system, and the primary notes are whatever I choose.

When I was using Evernote, the inbox was the knowledge base and notebooks were the focus. I just had too many different potential projects going on to manage this well.

Looking to focus.

I'll revisit Firefox and SingleFile.

Explanation of the zip file inside.

https://github.com/gildas-lormeau/SingleFile/blob/master/faq...

[2] https://github.com/gildas-lormeau/SingleFile/blob/master/faq...

I agree it would be "great" a complete website in the ZIP. I think this is technically possible, someone just have to code it.

[1] https://github.com/gildas-lormeau/SingleFile#singlefile

Singlefile [1] works pretty well for me for that use case.

It has the added advantage that the file format is just plain HTML, and together with “reader mode” in most browsers, it’s a great way to save long-form text or other mostly static pages for later reference.

It obviously doesn’t work for very dynamic pages, let alone web apps.

[1] https://github.com/gildas-lormeau/SingleFile

I’ve tried all the third party services for archiving interesting things over the years but nothing beats saving everything to your local filesystem using [SingleFile](https://github.com/gildas-lormeau/SingleFile) and using a full-text search front over the directory (something like Houdahspot, for example).

If you want to save them as a file locally you could use something like SingleFile. You could also put the URL for each wiki into archive.org's Save Page Now so that anyone can access it. Either way, without scripting, you'll have to do some manual labor to get the URL for each wiki.

For small numbers of pages, the SingleFile[0] extension for Firefox (WebExtension) is pretty handy. It's not "archival quality", though, if that's the kind of "archiving" you're doing.

[0] https://github.com/gildas-lormeau/SingleFile