.dotfiles VS delta

Once I finished the C code and compiled I only had to set the ld library path so that ffi.load can find my module: export LD_LIBRARY_PATH="$HOME/.config/nvim/lua/config/nvim/" I wanted to do everything from C but calling drop (source) requires a struct args that doesn't look fun to setup. The C code is available here and the ffi here. And here the final utility for the better gF

Credit goes to https://github.com/protiumx/.dotfiles/blob/main/stow/wezterm/.config/wezterm/wezterm.lua

I use LspSaga in my status line with lua line, config here

Another cool feature is that you can get the process name and working dir, so in my Tab title I have a nerd font icon and the folder. In addition the font color changes if the tab has new output for any of its pane. You can check my config here

(source)

I created a new branch and a PR in my dotfiles repo to integrate this changes in case it helps to anyone https://github.com/protiumx/.dotfiles/pull/2

You can check my powerlevel10k config file here.

Thanks for the difftastic & zoxide tips.

However, I've been using this git pager/difftool: https://github.com/dandavison/delta

While it's not structural like difft, it does produce more readable output for me (at least when scrolling fast through git log -p /scanning quickly

View on GitHub

I'm currently waiting on the integration between Delta and Difftastic:

https://github.com/dandavison/delta/issues/535

Difftastic now has JSON output, whic should make it much easier to build this.

I'm surely in the minority here. I've been using Emacs for almost a decade now, but I just can't get into the Magit workflow. I've tried several times, but always end up going back to Git on the command line. I have dozens of aliases, shell integrations, a nice diff viewer[1], etc., and interacting with Git has become muscle memory. I can commit, cherry-pick, rebase, bisect, fix conflicts, etc., in a fraction of the time it would take me to navigate Magit's UI. I'm sure with enough practice, a Magit user could do this more quickly and efficiently, but honestly, with some custom-built porcelain, Git's UI is not so bad. Though this could very well be Stockholm syndrome after using it for such a long time...

For whatever reason, Magit's opinionated workflows never clicked with me. A part of it is the concern that it will do something weird to my repo that I'll then have to waste more time undoing manually. I usually don't trust sugary wrappers around tools. And another is the fact I don't use Emacs on all machines, and setting up Git on a remote system is just a matter of copying over my config and some shell integrations.

Also, on a more personal note, I find the cultish fanboyism whenever Magit is brought up slightly offputting. Does anyone have anything bad to say about it? No software can realistically be this infallible. :)

[1]: https://github.com/dandavison/delta

For looking at diffs I still prefer the command line though, and use delta to view diffs between commits or branches.