proposal-regexp-legacy-features
Legacy static properties of the RegExp constructor in JavaScript (by tc39)
| proposal-regexp-legacy-features | proposal-module-expressions | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 39 | 417 | |
| - | 0.0% | |
| 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| 7 months ago | over 1 year ago | |
| HTML | ||
| Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal | MIT License |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
proposal-regexp-legacy-features
Posts with mentions or reviews of proposal-regexp-legacy-features.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-01-28.
-
Updates from 80th TC39 meeting
regex-set-notation: Adopting Unicode behavior for set notation in regular expressions.
proposal-module-expressions
Posts with mentions or reviews of proposal-module-expressions.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-12-05.
-
[AskJS] What are virtual modules
Out of interest, a system like this is proposed as a native language feature:
- JS Module Blocks Proposal
-
[AskJS] Why so much hate toward Javascript from C#, Java, Php, Ruby programmer etc ?
There's an ongoing RFC for module blocks that might improve that a little.
-
ES Modules assumed HTTP2-Push, which is now dying (and unlikely to come back)... what now?
Should TC39 go back and define a multi-module-per-file format now? There's some tinkerings of a proposal for "inline module blocks" which might offer an option, though that doesn't appear to be the intended usage.
-
Updates from 80th TC39 meeting
Module Blocks: Module blocks are syntax for the contents of a module, which can then be imported.
What are some alternatives?
When comparing proposal-regexp-legacy-features and proposal-module-expressions you can also consider the following projects:
proposal-json-modules - Proposal to import JSON files as modules
proposal-intl-DateTimeFormat-formatRange - ECMA 402 proposal for DateTimeFormat.prototype.{formatRange,formatRangeToParts}
proposal-array-find-from-last - Proposal for Array.prototype.findLast and Array.prototype.findLastIndex.
proposal-intl-extend-timezonename - Extend TimeZoneName Option Proposal
proposal-regexp-legacy-features vs proposal-json-modules
proposal-module-expressions vs proposal-intl-DateTimeFormat-formatRange
proposal-regexp-legacy-features vs proposal-array-find-from-last
proposal-module-expressions vs proposal-json-modules
proposal-regexp-legacy-features vs proposal-intl-extend-timezonename