proposal-record-tuple
proposal-array-grouping
proposal-record-tuple | proposal-array-grouping | |
---|---|---|
73 | 19 | |
2,430 | 513 | |
0.8% | - | |
2.7 | 0.0 | |
5 months ago | 5 months ago | |
HTML | HTML | |
- | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
proposal-record-tuple
-
Union, intersection, difference, and more are coming to JavaScript Sets
relevant issue, which is at the crux of this problem: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-record-tuple/issues/387
-
The Everything NPM Package
There are still so many basic things that aren't in the JS stdlib, though. A good example is Map - if you need to use a tuple of two values as a key, you're SOL because there's no way to customize key comparisons. Hopefully we'll get https://tc39.es/proposal-record-tuple/ eventually, but meanwhile languages ranging from C++ to Java to Python have had some sensible way to do this for over 20 years now.
-
Deep Cloning Objects in JavaScript, the Modern Way
If you’re reaching for structuredClone, what you really want is native immutable Record and Tuple syntax, and the companion “deep path properties” syntax which allows for efficient and ergonomic immutable updates:
- https://github.com/tc39/proposal-record-tuple
-
Cool language features that Rust is missing?
It will be called "record" in JavaScript which will swing the popularity back the other way I guess (currently a language proposal)
-
Why doesn't TypeScript properly type Object.keys?
I suspect considering the strong desire to maintain consistency with JavaScript, we will eventually see something that when the Record proposal passes through tc39
-
ES2023 features list!
I hope the Record and Tuple proposal makes it through
-
ES2023 introduces new array copying methods to JavaScript
I mean, I'd love some real immutable/persistent data structures in JS by default, or even some Immer-like syntax sugar. Something like the record/tuple proposal would be awesome.
-
What's new in ECMAScript 2023
This will become very useful once Records and Tuples are a thing, because it allows you to store object references in a record/tuple (which by definition can only contain primitives).
-
[AskJS] Is JavaScript missing some built-in methods?
Record and tuple is at stage 2
-
The huge potential of Kotlin/Wasm
Also, js has an ongoing immutable value data types proposal.
proposal-array-grouping
-
TC39: Add Object.groupBy and Map.groupBy
Global iterator type is coming: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-iterator-helpers
But a method named `groupBy` on iterators traditionally means a different thing: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-array-grouping/issues/51#is...
Global iterable type it's too late for, since there's many extant iterables in the language and on the web which don't have it in their prototype chain and can't reasonably be changed.
-
What's New in Node.js 21
Array grouping to combine like data into groups using Object.groupBy() and Map.groupBy().
-
Updates from the 97th TC39 meeting
Array Grouping: A proposal to make grouping of array items easier.
-
Snap.js - A competitor to Lodash
They are coming out with array.group() soon, which is supposed to also fulfil the use-case of partitioning :) - https://github.com/tc39/proposal-array-grouping.
-
[AskJS] Is JavaScript missing some built-in methods?
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-array-grouping for those curious
-
Set methods proposal reaches stage 3
I'm also looking forward to map.emplace() and arr.group() and iterator helpers.
-
SmooshGate
At the end of the day, it comes down to whether browser vendors are willing to ship the feature even though it breaks said websites, and they do have visitor data to back those decisions. If the rule was "never break any website ever", you'd be able to block proposals you don't personally like by crafting a website that "gets broken" by that proposal.
At least in the array grouping proposal, they did evaluate amount and popularity of possibly breaking sites, before eventually renaming the method from .groupBy to .group
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-array-grouping/issues/37
-
New ECMAScript 23 array features
The proposal is described here.
-
how can I split an array into multiple arrays based on a property?
Remarkably, this is now a TC39 proposal.
-
Upcoming ECMAScript features I'm excited about
Proposal, Polyfill
What are some alternatives?
zod - TypeScript-first schema validation with static type inference
es1995 - ES1995 – The Missing JS Polyfill
Immer - Create the next immutable state by mutating the current one
retro-random-number
typescript-eslint - :sparkles: Monorepo for all the tooling which enables ESLint to support TypeScript
proposal-regexp-r-escape - Regular Expression `\R` Escape for ECMAScript
typescript-is
proposal-string-cooked - ECMAScript proposal for String.cooked built-in template tag
TypeScript - TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
proposal-function-pipe-flow - A proposal to standardize helper functions for serial function application and function composition.
proposals - Tracking ECMAScript Proposals
proposal-array-from-async - Draft specification for a proposed Array.fromAsync method in JavaScript.