proposal-private-fields-in-in
EcmaScript proposal to provide brand checks without exceptions (by tc39)
proposal-private-fields-in-in | proposal-module-expressions | |
---|---|---|
3 | 9 | |
29 | 417 | |
- | 0.0% | |
2.8 | 0.0 | |
almost 3 years ago | over 1 year ago | |
HTML | HTML | |
MIT License | MIT License |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
proposal-private-fields-in-in
Posts with mentions or reviews of proposal-private-fields-in-in.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-04-13.
-
JS classes are not “just syntactic sugar”
I believe this was true, but it is becoming increasingly untrue as the spec gives more and more abilities and semantics to classes. Like, as you say, private fields, and more on the way.
-
What is the current state of private fields in ES6 classes?
Ergonomic brand checks for Private Fields
-
Updates from 80th TC39 meeting
Ergonomic Brand Checks for Private Fields: Check if an object has a private field, and if not, have some fallback behavior.
proposal-module-expressions
Posts with mentions or reviews of proposal-module-expressions.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-12-05.
-
[AskJS] What are virtual modules
Out of interest, a system like this is proposed as a native language feature:
- JS Module Blocks Proposal
-
[AskJS] Why so much hate toward Javascript from C#, Java, Php, Ruby programmer etc ?
There's an ongoing RFC for module blocks that might improve that a little.
-
ES Modules assumed HTTP2-Push, which is now dying (and unlikely to come back)... what now?
Should TC39 go back and define a multi-module-per-file format now? There's some tinkerings of a proposal for "inline module blocks" which might offer an option, though that doesn't appear to be the intended usage.
-
Updates from 80th TC39 meeting
Module Blocks: Module blocks are syntax for the contents of a module, which can then be imported.
What are some alternatives?
When comparing proposal-private-fields-in-in and proposal-module-expressions you can also consider the following projects:
proposal-intl-DateTimeFormat-formatRange - ECMA 402 proposal for DateTimeFormat.prototype.{formatRange,formatRangeToParts}
proposal-class-brand-check - JavaScript proposal to provide class brand checks
proposal-json-modules - Proposal to import JSON files as modules
proposal-private-methods - Private methods and getter/setters for ES6 classes
proposal-class-fields - Orthogonally-informed combination of public and private fields proposals
proposal-private-fields-in-in vs proposal-intl-DateTimeFormat-formatRange
proposal-module-expressions vs proposal-intl-DateTimeFormat-formatRange
proposal-private-fields-in-in vs proposal-class-brand-check
proposal-module-expressions vs proposal-json-modules
proposal-private-fields-in-in vs proposal-private-methods
proposal-private-fields-in-in vs proposal-json-modules
proposal-private-fields-in-in vs proposal-class-fields