proposal-private-fields-in-in
EcmaScript proposal to provide brand checks without exceptions (by tc39)
proposal-async-do-expressions
async `do` expressions for JavaScript (by bakkot)
proposal-private-fields-in-in | proposal-async-do-expressions | |
---|---|---|
3 | 4 | |
29 | 106 | |
- | 0.0% | |
2.8 | 2.7 | |
almost 3 years ago | over 3 years ago | |
HTML | HTML | |
MIT License | - |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
proposal-private-fields-in-in
Posts with mentions or reviews of proposal-private-fields-in-in.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-04-13.
-
JS classes are not “just syntactic sugar”
I believe this was true, but it is becoming increasingly untrue as the spec gives more and more abilities and semantics to classes. Like, as you say, private fields, and more on the way.
-
What is the current state of private fields in ES6 classes?
Ergonomic brand checks for Private Fields
-
Updates from 80th TC39 meeting
Ergonomic Brand Checks for Private Fields: Check if an object has a private field, and if not, have some fallback behavior.
proposal-async-do-expressions
Posts with mentions or reviews of proposal-async-do-expressions.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-09-14.
-
4 JavaScript Concepts That Every Developer Should Know
Hoisting still applies to let and const. And IIFEs tend to still have relevance when it comes to await, though top level await in modules is one step closer to killing them off for good (async do expressions would be the final nail in that coffin).
-
Unravelling `Async for` Loops
A little more verbose than your example but https://github.com/tc39/proposal-async-do-expressions would help with this.
-
What is the async/await equivalent of this piece of Promise code?
Or with async do expressions
-
Updates from 80th TC39 meeting
async do: async do expressions allow you to introduce an asynchronous context within synchronous code without needing an immediately-invoked async function expression.
What are some alternatives?
When comparing proposal-private-fields-in-in and proposal-async-do-expressions you can also consider the following projects:
proposal-intl-DateTimeFormat-formatRange - ECMA 402 proposal for DateTimeFormat.prototype.{formatRange,formatRangeToParts}
go - The Go programming language
proposal-class-brand-check - JavaScript proposal to provide class brand checks
zig - General-purpose programming language and toolchain for maintaining robust, optimal, and reusable software.
proposal-private-methods - Private methods and getter/setters for ES6 classes
proposal-json-modules - Proposal to import JSON files as modules
proposal-class-fields - Orthogonally-informed combination of public and private fields proposals
proposal-private-fields-in-in vs proposal-intl-DateTimeFormat-formatRange
proposal-async-do-expressions vs go
proposal-private-fields-in-in vs proposal-class-brand-check
proposal-async-do-expressions vs zig
proposal-private-fields-in-in vs proposal-private-methods
proposal-private-fields-in-in vs proposal-json-modules
proposal-private-fields-in-in vs proposal-class-fields