proposal-pattern-matching VS share-file-systems

Note, however, that there is a proposal to add pattern matching to JS.

There's an ECMAScript proposal that is in the works to add this feature to the language! It's going to look something like this.

More importantly, TypeScript typically commits to build things into itself when the proposal in JavaScript reaches Stage 3. The pattern matching proposal in JavaScript is Stage 1, but depends on many other proposals as well that may or may not need to be at Stage 3 as well for it to work. This particular proposal is interested on pattern matching on JavaScript Objects and other primitives, just like Python does with it’s native primitives. These are also dynamic types which helps in some areas, but makes it harder than others. Additionally, the JavaScript type annotations proposal needs to possibly account for this. So it’s going to be awhile. Like many years.

For true™ functional programming in JS, native pattern matching and partial function application are missing (at least for now: 1, 2). For proper OOP, it lacks real interfaces and compile-time dependency injection.

The proposal for pattern matching syntax seems more akin to what they're looking for.

https://github.com/tc39/proposal-pattern-matching

There's a proposal to add something like that to JavaScript but it's been stuck in limbo since 2017 although there are libraries like ts-pattern which implement it already.

I'll admit, it is easy to assert that the TypeScript language should not be involved in the matters of packages but I also wonder if we're moving towards a point where interfaces will be as common as namespaces and whether or not it would be sensible for the language to incorporate such type assertions into the language formally, after all, it already compiles to various forms of JavaScript and there is a stage 1 proposal submitted to the TC39 committee to give JavaScript pattern matching. If adopted, wouldn't it make sense to allow TypeScript to compile a type into a type guard for the native JavaScript pattern matcher?

Both are active tc39 proposals :)

https://github.com/tc39/proposal-pipeline-operator - Stage 2

https://github.com/tc39/proposal-pattern-matching - Stage 1

Hopefully we get both in the next couple of years.

We often add promising TC39 proposals into Civet so people can experiment without waiting.

We've added https://github.com/tc39/proposal-pipeline-operator, a variant of https://github.com/tc39/proposal-pattern-matching, a variant of https://github.com/tc39/proposal-string-dedent and others.

Since our goal is to be 99% compatible with ES we'll need to accommodate any proposals that become standard and pick up anything TC39 leaves on the table (rest parameters in any position, etc.)

Some things I learned about trusted localhost HTTPS:

* Windows is the easiest... by far. There is only one trust store and its extremely easy to access at different levels of trust. Firefox has its own trust store so you can either add your certs to both the Windows store AND the Firefox trust store or flip a config in Firefox to tell it to use the Windows trust store like everyone else.

* Linux is a challenge because you have to add your certificates to the OS trust store and then each browser has their own trust stores.

* MacOS is pretty close to impossible, at least fully automated. If the cert is not registered with a third party of the OS's choosing the cert will not be trusted in the browser. The way around this is to manually add your localhost cert chain to the MacOS keychain.

If anybody wants an example here is something I wrote a ways back in JS (but please be warned its specific to my application:

* Build the certificate chain - https://github.com/prettydiff/share-file-systems/blob/master...

* Install the cert by OS type - https://github.com/prettydiff/share-file-systems/blob/master...

That second sample also installs pcap so that I can serve on localhost over ports 80/443.

Some developers believe everything is always a framework or any attempt to avoid frameworks creates a new framework. I cannot help these people. Any non-religion is a cult type nonsense of affirming the consequent fallacy.

Otherwise a valid example is this one file that creates a complete OS-like GUI in the browser awaiting content typically populated from WebSocket messaging: https://github.com/prettydiff/share-file-systems/blob/master...

I wrote a similar concept around private internet access to your file system. It’s at https://github.com/prettydiff/share-file-systems

The window and state management can be demoed on my personal site at https://prettydiff.com

File sharing and soon remote execution over the internet cross OS. Private and no servers.

https://github.com/prettydiff/share-file-systems

Done: https://github.com/prettydiff/share-file-systems/blob/master...

You would need a warrant to extract the messages/identity directly from a person's computer as there is nothing otherwise to obtain.

Perhaps this is true in the context of the web. But I got tired of watching the web as a platform continuously repeat the same mistakes so I started working on something different. In the last day or two I was finally able to functionally prove my competing idea in a way that forcefully imposes privacy with complete Zero Trust conformance.

https://github.com/prettydiff/share-file-systems/blob/master...

I am performing a similar file system tree navigation asynchronously in Node.js which is just a shallow API over the C Linux FS APIs.

I can see you are using opendir and closedir functions? What is the benefit from using the opendir function[1] when readdir[2] can be called on a location directly? Is the benefit that opendir returns a file descriptor for use in opening a stream to gather directory object descriptors?

[1] https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/opendir.3.html

[2] https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/readdir.3.html

Your project is probably more mature but if you want an alternate approach to examine here is I have been doing it: https://github.com/prettydiff/share-file-systems/blob/master...

I considering changing my use of readdir to use the withFileTypes option so that it returns a list of directory entries (objects of artifact name and type) instead of a list of conditions to discern types like I am doing on lines 382-432.

Solved.

Solved for both Windows and Linux (Debian, Arch, Fedora). I might have unlikely solved this of OSX as well, but I am not buying Apply hardware just to test it.

What my solution does is check for certificates created by the project during a build step. If the certificates don't exist it creates them, installs them in the OS, and also install them in the browser. Installation in the browsers is required in Linux and only for FireFox in Windows. These are cert chains containing a self-signed root, intermediary CA, and a local domain cert.

I have these certs configured to work with my own domains so that I can connect to a subdomain addressed to a loopback IP and the cert recognizes that domain, but the domain "localhost" works as well. Sometimes its nice to access a real domain to avoid any restrictions imposed upon accessing address "localhost". You just have to change the domains at the bottom of your OpenSSL option files.

Here is how I solved it with vanilla TypeScript in Node.js (also requires locally installed OpenSSL:

* OpenSSL option file 1 - https://github.com/prettydiff/share-file-systems/blob/master...

* OpenSSL option file 2 - https://github.com/prettydiff/share-file-systems/blob/master...

* Certificate library - https://github.com/prettydiff/share-file-systems/blob/master...

* Certificate interface from build tool - https://github.com/prettydiff/share-file-systems/blob/master...

* Certificate installation - https://github.com/prettydiff/share-file-systems/blob/master...

If you have any questions just open a Github issue on the project.

Email: [email protected]

15 years experience with JavaScript, 6 years experience with TypeScript. I am currently writing a Node based OS in TypeScript to solve for decentralization (not Web3): https://github.com/prettydiff/share-file-systems

I understand performance aggressively enough far beyond the comfort of most developers: https://github.com/prettydiff/wisdom/blob/master/performance...

I started a JS based file sharing application a few years back. It started as a thought experiment of just exposing the file system to the browser in a familiar OS kind of user interface. As new features are added over time it has become more like a high level OS.

https://github.com/prettydiff/share-file-systems

Some architectural decisions I made:

* Micro-service based

* I am now using WebSockets for all services and communication. That has proven in the application to be 7x faster than HTTP.

* I have a universal format wrapping all service messaging, kind of like sending a letter in an envelope. This allows me to using a single service end point for all services and a single means of service monitoring.

* I did not like the existing test automation solutions based upon CDP, because they are too slow and fragile. Also, they do not provide support for a peer-to-peer experience. So I wrote my own test automation solution for testing in the browser and its much faster and predictable.

* I am using an identity based authentication mechanism to restrict access to known users/devices.

* I just write to the file system instead of using a database for data storage. This allows for much faster application start up times and lowers complexity. The performance difference is insignificant after accounting for that in most cases opening a file is more costly than arbitrarily writing to the file system.

* I figured out how to install certificates using automation in both Windows and Linux which allows me to run the application using encrypted transmission protocols (https/wss) on localhost.