proposal-intl-extend-timezonename
Extend TimeZoneName Option Proposal (by tc39-transfer)
proposal-intl-extend-timezonename | proposal-module-expressions | |
---|---|---|
1 | 9 | |
7 | 417 | |
- | 0.0% | |
0.0 | 0.0 | |
over 2 years ago | over 1 year ago | |
HTML | HTML | |
MIT License | MIT License |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
proposal-intl-extend-timezonename
Posts with mentions or reviews of proposal-intl-extend-timezonename.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-01-28.
-
Updates from 80th TC39 meeting
Extend TimeZoneName Option: Extend the timeZoneName option in Intl.DateTimeFormat object to support more formatted options, part of EMCA 402.
proposal-module-expressions
Posts with mentions or reviews of proposal-module-expressions.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-12-05.
-
[AskJS] What are virtual modules
Out of interest, a system like this is proposed as a native language feature:
- JS Module Blocks Proposal
-
[AskJS] Why so much hate toward Javascript from C#, Java, Php, Ruby programmer etc ?
There's an ongoing RFC for module blocks that might improve that a little.
-
ES Modules assumed HTTP2-Push, which is now dying (and unlikely to come back)... what now?
Should TC39 go back and define a multi-module-per-file format now? There's some tinkerings of a proposal for "inline module blocks" which might offer an option, though that doesn't appear to be the intended usage.
-
Updates from 80th TC39 meeting
Module Blocks: Module blocks are syntax for the contents of a module, which can then be imported.
What are some alternatives?
When comparing proposal-intl-extend-timezonename and proposal-module-expressions you can also consider the following projects:
proposal-intl-displaynames-v2 - Intl DisplayNames API V2
proposal-intl-DateTimeFormat-formatRange - ECMA 402 proposal for DateTimeFormat.prototype.{formatRange,formatRangeToParts}
RegExp.escape - Proposal for investigating RegExp escaping for the ECMAScript standard
proposal-json-modules - Proposal to import JSON files as modules
proposal-intl-eradisplay - Intl.DateTimeFormat displays era field only if date displayed is in same era as today's
proposal-regexp-legacy-features - Legacy static properties of the RegExp constructor in JavaScript
proposal-intl-extend-timezonename vs proposal-intl-displaynames-v2
proposal-module-expressions vs proposal-intl-DateTimeFormat-formatRange
proposal-intl-extend-timezonename vs RegExp.escape
proposal-module-expressions vs proposal-json-modules
proposal-intl-extend-timezonename vs proposal-intl-eradisplay
proposal-intl-extend-timezonename vs proposal-json-modules
proposal-intl-extend-timezonename vs proposal-regexp-legacy-features