proposal-import-assertions VS proposal-explicit-resource-management

SO, you're using webpack to support CSS imports here, BUT, did you know that you can do this in vanilla JS without webpack using something called import assertions:

This could be implemented as an import assertion[1]:

import foo from 'http://example.com/foo' assert { sha256sum: '...' }

This feature would even be useful in the web platform in general. Along with an assertion for importing plain text files (not just JSON files).

[1]: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-import-assertions

Worth noting that Import Assertions were downgraded to stage 2 from stage 3. The proposal page may continue to say "stage 3" until it can be updated.

Import Assertions: Proposal for syntax to import ES modules with assertions

Also, I'm not sure how that'd work with import assertions. That'd add another round of questions.

Hi, there is a way to import json file like:

If you want the real thing, you're looking for import assertions.

But it's still only a proposal, currently at stage 3 (which means it's almost finalised, pending any critical feedback or refinements, before it gets implemented). You can view the import assertions proposal on GitHub.

I wouldn't use import assertions in any browser since they are still a stage 3 proposal so any browser which implements them is doing before it is standardized and shouldn't be relied upon for anything that matters.

There's an issue for that to be added as aprt of import assertions https://github.com/tc39/proposal-import-assertions/issues/11...

The standard doesn't have anything to do with TypeScript, not sure where you got that from? https://github.com/tc39/proposal-explicit-resource-managemen...

The explicit resource management proposal tries to make it a bit easier for us, by allowing the resource to declare how it should be managed, rather than expecting us to clean everything up when we use the resource. We get a new keyword using to define a variable (rather than const or let), which tells the runtime to clean up the resource at the end of the function.

Enter the explicit resource management proposal, which describes — among many other things — a new using operator that was introduced in TypeScript 5.2 and is making its way into JavaScript. From the top of the README file, here’s what this proposal aims to do:

In addition to this, is the new (stage 3 even!)explicit resource management proposal[0], supported by TypeScript version >= 5.2[1]

Though I agree that async context is better fit for this generally, the RMP should be good for telemetry around objects that have defined lifetime semantics, which is a step in the right direction you can use today

[0]: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-explicit-resource-managemen...

[1]: https://www.totaltypescript.com/typescript-5-2-new-keyword-u...

It's too early for that, https://github.com/tc39/proposal-explicit-resource-management

[3]: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-explicit-resource-managemen...

I'm not _entirely_ sure which RAII you mean, but if you mean something like C#'s `using` or Java's `try-with-resources` or Python's `with`, then https://github.com/tc39/proposal-explicit-resource-managemen... and https://github.com/tc39/proposal-async-explicit-resource-man... are in stage 3 (of 4 stages) in ECMAScript's language proposal lifecycle and will be coming to a JS engine near you behind a flag soon-ish.