proposal-explicit-resource-management
opentelemetry-proto
proposal-explicit-resource-management | opentelemetry-proto | |
---|---|---|
22 | 8 | |
703 | 526 | |
4.0% | 2.7% | |
6.5 | 8.0 | |
27 days ago | 5 days ago | |
JavaScript | Makefile | |
BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
proposal-explicit-resource-management
- Cooperation between Cloudflare Workers has become amazing thanks to RPC support
-
Proposal: Signals as a Built-In Primitive of JavaScript
The standard doesn't have anything to do with TypeScript, not sure where you got that from? https://github.com/tc39/proposal-explicit-resource-managemen...
-
How does TypeScript's explicit resource management work?
The explicit resource management proposal tries to make it a bit easier for us, by allowing the resource to declare how it should be managed, rather than expecting us to clean everything up when we use the resource. We get a new keyword using to define a variable (rather than const or let), which tells the runtime to clean up the resource at the end of the function.
-
Using using in TypeScript for resource management
Enter the explicit resource management proposal, which describes — among many other things — a new using operator that was introduced in TypeScript 5.2 and is making its way into JavaScript. From the top of the README file, here’s what this proposal aims to do:
-
OpenTelemetry in 2023
In addition to this, is the new (stage 3 even!)explicit resource management proposal[0], supported by TypeScript version >= 5.2[1]
Though I agree that async context is better fit for this generally, the RMP should be good for telemetry around objects that have defined lifetime semantics, which is a step in the right direction you can use today
[0]: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-explicit-resource-managemen...
[1]: https://www.totaltypescript.com/typescript-5-2-new-keyword-u...
- ECMAScript Explicit Resource Management Proposal
-
Why is JavaScript so hated?
It's too early for that, https://github.com/tc39/proposal-explicit-resource-management
-
TypeScript 5.2's New Keyword: 'using'
[3]: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-explicit-resource-managemen...
-
Douglas Crockford: “We should stop using JavaScript”
I'm not _entirely_ sure which RAII you mean, but if you mean something like C#'s `using` or Java's `try-with-resources` or Python's `with`, then https://github.com/tc39/proposal-explicit-resource-managemen... and https://github.com/tc39/proposal-async-explicit-resource-man... are in stage 3 (of 4 stages) in ECMAScript's language proposal lifecycle and will be coming to a JS engine near you behind a flag soon-ish.
opentelemetry-proto
-
OpenTelemetry Journey #00 - Introduction to OpenTelemetry
Maybe, you are asking yourself: "But I already had instrumented my applications with vendor-specific libraries and I'm using their agents and monitoring tools, why should I change to OpenTelemetry?". The answer is: maybe you're right and I don't want to encourage you to update the way how you are doing observability in your applications, that's a hard and complex task. But, if you are starting from scratch or you are not happy with your current observability infrastructure, OpenTelemetry is the best choice, independently of the backend telemetry tool that you are using. I would like to invite you to take a look at the number of exporters available in the collector contrib section, if your backend tracing tool is not there, probably it's already using the Open Telemetry Protocol (OTLP) and you will be able to use the core collector. Otherwise, you should consider changing your backend telemetry tool or contributing to the project creating a new exporter.
-
Did OpenTelemetry deliver on its promise in 2023?
Here's the example payloads for OTLP over JSON and example of how to ingest them: https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-proto/tree/m...
-
Amazon EKS Monitoring with OpenTelemetry [Step By Step Guide]
An OTLP receiver can receive data via gRPC or HTTP using the OTLP format. There are advanced configurations that you can enable via the YAML file.
-
Transition to OpenTelemetry, enhanced policy testing, and more - Cerbos v0.32
Cerbos fully transitioned from OpenCensus to OpenTelemetry, a move that significantly boosts our metrics and tracing capabilities. This shift allows for more efficient integration with a variety of observability products supporting the OpenTelemetry protocol (OTLP) but also offers the flexibility to use push metrics and fine-tune trace sampling. With this update, configuration through the tracing block in Cerbos files is deprecated in favor of using OpenTelemetry environment variables.
-
OpenTelemetry is not just for Monitoring and Troubleshooting any longer. Announcing Tracetest Open Beta!
Networking is Easy (Really!) Since you install the agent directly into the environment where you are running your application, there is no complex networking. When developing in localMode, the agent listens on the common OpenTelemetry Line Protocol (OTLP) on ports 4317 & 4318 automatically.
-
OpenTelemetry in 2023
Oh nice, thank you (and also solumos) for the links! It looks like oteps/pull/171 (merged June 2023) expanded and superseded the opentelemetry-proto/pull/346 PR (closed Jul 2022) [0]. The former resulted in merging OpenTelemetry Enhancement Proposal 156 [1], with some interesting results especially for 'Phase 2' where they implemented columnar storage end-to-end (see the Validation section [2]):
* For univariate time series, OTel Arrow is 2 to 2.5 better in terms of bandwidth reduction ... and the end-to-end speed is 3.1 to 11.2 times faster
* For multivariate time series, OTel Arrow is 3 to 7 times better in terms of bandwidth reduction ... Phase 2 has [not yet] been .. estimated but similar results are expected.
* For logs, OTel Arrow is 1.6 to 2 times better in terms of bandwidth reduction ... and the end-to-end speed is 2.3 to 4.86 times faster
* For traces, OTel Arrow is 1.7 to 2.8 times better in terms of bandwidth reduction ... and the end-to-end speed is 3.37 to 6.16 times faster
[0]: https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-proto/pull/3...
[1]: https://github.com/open-telemetry/oteps/blob/main/text/0156-...
[2]: https://github.com/open-telemetry/oteps/blob/main/text/0156-...
-
Is Protobuf.js Faster Than JSON?
We then modified the benchmark to encode our example data which is an opentelemetry trace data.
What are some alternatives?
caniuse - Raw browser/feature support data from caniuse.com
apm-server - APM Server
librope - UTF-8 rope library for C
odigos - Distributed tracing without code changes. 🚀 Instantly monitor any application using OpenTelemetry and eBPF
pidove
opentelemetry-java - OpenTelemetry Java SDK
proposal-class-method-parameter-decorators - Decorators for ECMAScript class method and constructor parameters
protobuf - Protocol Buffers for JavaScript (& TypeScript).
search-benchmark-game - Search engine benchmark (Tantivy, Lucene, PISA, ...)
community - OpenTelemetry community content
proposal-iterator-helpers - Methods for working with iterators in ECMAScript
opentelemetry-collector - OpenTelemetry Collector