proposal-do-expressions
proposal-type-annotations
proposal-do-expressions | proposal-type-annotations | |
---|---|---|
19 | 101 | |
1,066 | 4,097 | |
2.3% | 0.7% | |
0.0 | 4.7 | |
about 3 years ago | about 2 months ago | |
HTML | JavaScript | |
MIT License | - |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
proposal-do-expressions
-
TypeScript Is Surprisingly OK for Compilers
> no pattern matching/switch expressions
They're still waiting on the do expression proposal for that (https://github.com/tc39/proposal-do-expressions), which has been in the bikeshedding stage for the past five years.
-
[AskJS] Opinions on using self executing functions as multi-line expressions.
At some point, it may be superseded by do blocks, but for now it's really your best bet.
-
What is this called? { id ? <Dashboard/> : <Login/> } and can I make it check for multiple things like a switch case?
But there is a proposal for do-expression : https://github.com/tc39/proposal-do-expressions
-
Using {Blocks} in Rust & Go for Fun & Profit
It's also the reason why do expressions are my most anticipated feature for JS.
-
Pipe Operator (|>) For JavaScript
> They should repurpose `do` so that `do {}` (without the `while`) is an expression that you can put statements inside and return the last statement.
There's a proposal for precisely that. Unfortunately, only Stage 1 though.
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-do-expressions
- Is a single ternary operator inside the returned JSX acceptable?
-
[AskJS] Is there ever a good use for loose blocks in JS?
It's one of the main reasons why I really want the do-expression propsal to work out, because then it would become:
- The TC39 Process
-
[AskJS] What are still present issues in contemporary (2022) JavaScript?
Do blocks. Okay, this is actually a proposal so maybe someday. Basically blocks that can resolve to an expression.
-
'The best thing we can do today to JavaScript is to retire it,' says JSON creator Douglas Crockford • DEVCLASS
Tomorrow, do expressions:
proposal-type-annotations
-
Bun 1.1
That proposal is not fully compatible with Typescript: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-type-annotations?tab=readme...
-
Go 1.22 Release Notes
They held a meeting a few months ago so it's alive but probably still years away.
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-type-annotations/issues/184
-
[AskJS] Kicking a dead horse - TS vs JS
I particularly like this thread in the TC39 types proposal. TypeScript IS a development trojan horse and locks you into the Microsoft Way of being a JS developer.
- Strong static typing, a hill I'm willing to die on...
-
HTML First – Six principles for building simple, maintainable, web software
Edit: There is a proposal to extend JavaScript with type annotations, which would allow ("a reasonably large subset") of TypeScript to run directly in the browser. Yay!
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-type-annotations
-
Building React Components Using Unions in TypeScript
More importantly, TypeScript typically commits to build things into itself when the proposal in JavaScript reaches Stage 3. The pattern matching proposal in JavaScript is Stage 1, but depends on many other proposals as well that may or may not need to be at Stage 3 as well for it to work. This particular proposal is interested on pattern matching on JavaScript Objects and other primitives, just like Python does with it’s native primitives. These are also dynamic types which helps in some areas, but makes it harder than others. Additionally, the JavaScript type annotations proposal needs to possibly account for this. So it’s going to be awhile. Like many years.
-
Show HN: Conway's Game of Life in TypeScript's type system
this is exactly what I want from the _Types as Comments_ proposal[0] as I think it's the only way that types can feasibly become part of the language. It's hard to imagine how all of the concepts TS introduces via special syntax can be covered otherwise.
[0] https://tc39.es/proposal-type-annotations
-
Why Htmx Does Not Have a Build Step
Crossing my fingers that the proposal for allowing (browser-ignored) type annotations in javascript progresses: https://tc39.es/proposal-type-annotations/
Between that, HTTP2/3 and ES modules many of the downsides for building apps with no compile step are almost completely mitigated.
-
TypeScript Without Transpilation
JSDoc can get you pretty far, but it can be clumsy sometimes. There’s a [TC39 proposal](https://github.com/tc39/proposal-type-annotations) to allow types to live in JS code and be treated as comments (similar with Python types today)
- Do you think typescript will ever have native support on brosers? Or we will have only the JS type annotations?
What are some alternatives?
native-messaging-bash - Bash Native Messaging host.
astexplorer - A web tool to explore the ASTs generated by various parsers.
captureSystemAudio - Capture system audio ("What-U-Hear")
Scala.js - Scala.js, the Scala to JavaScript compiler
proposal-pipeline-operator - A proposal for adding a useful pipe operator to JavaScript.
rescript-compiler - The compiler for ReScript.
proposal-upsert - ECMAScript Proposal, specs, and reference implementation for Map.prototype.upsert
Carp - A statically typed lisp, without a GC, for real-time applications.
caya - a tiny useful simple language experiment
d2-playground - An online runner to play, learn, and create with D2, the modern diagram scripting language that turns text to diagrams.
coffeescript - Unfancy JavaScript
proposal-record-tuple - ECMAScript proposal for the Record and Tuple value types. | Stage 2: it will change!