proposal-do-expressions
proposal-iterator-helpers
proposal-do-expressions | proposal-iterator-helpers | |
---|---|---|
19 | 35 | |
1,066 | 1,242 | |
2.3% | 2.6% | |
0.0 | 5.0 | |
about 3 years ago | 25 days ago | |
HTML | HTML | |
MIT License | - |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
proposal-do-expressions
-
TypeScript Is Surprisingly OK for Compilers
> no pattern matching/switch expressions
They're still waiting on the do expression proposal for that (https://github.com/tc39/proposal-do-expressions), which has been in the bikeshedding stage for the past five years.
-
[AskJS] Opinions on using self executing functions as multi-line expressions.
At some point, it may be superseded by do blocks, but for now it's really your best bet.
-
What is this called? { id ? <Dashboard/> : <Login/> } and can I make it check for multiple things like a switch case?
But there is a proposal for do-expression : https://github.com/tc39/proposal-do-expressions
-
Using {Blocks} in Rust & Go for Fun & Profit
It's also the reason why do expressions are my most anticipated feature for JS.
-
Pipe Operator (|>) For JavaScript
> They should repurpose `do` so that `do {}` (without the `while`) is an expression that you can put statements inside and return the last statement.
There's a proposal for precisely that. Unfortunately, only Stage 1 though.
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-do-expressions
- Is a single ternary operator inside the returned JSX acceptable?
-
[AskJS] Is there ever a good use for loose blocks in JS?
It's one of the main reasons why I really want the do-expression propsal to work out, because then it would become:
- The TC39 Process
-
[AskJS] What are still present issues in contemporary (2022) JavaScript?
Do blocks. Okay, this is actually a proposal so maybe someday. Basically blocks that can resolve to an expression.
-
'The best thing we can do today to JavaScript is to retire it,' says JSON creator Douglas Crockford • DEVCLASS
Tomorrow, do expressions:
proposal-iterator-helpers
-
TC39: Add Object.groupBy and Map.groupBy
Global iterator type is coming: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-iterator-helpers
But a method named `groupBy` on iterators traditionally means a different thing: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-array-grouping/issues/51#is...
Global iterable type it's too late for, since there's many extant iterables in the language and on the web which don't have it in their prototype chain and can't reasonably be changed.
-
Lodash just declared issue bankruptcy and closed every issue and open PR
Very much agreed. The amount of mileage we get from using Spread (literally the ...) alone has been amazing. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Refe... Iteration helpers is shipping soon, that'll be a huge help (async iteration helpers will be delayed for a while). https://github.com/tc39/proposal-iterator-helpers .
In the olden days, I feel like the codebases I worked on needed to use .apply() multiple times a week, to figure out some creative way of invoking functions. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Refe... That's all gone now; I'd take even odds that 50% of my team knows .call and .apply.
Chrome 117 is shipping Object.groupBy() and that's gonna be a huge help in eliminating a lot of the last places we end up using lodash. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Refe...
-
It’s 2023. Start using JavaScript Map and Set
Once this https://github.com/tc39/proposal-iterator-helpers reaches browsers, I'm prob gonna be exclusively using Maps.
- Why I Like Using Maps (and WeakMaps) for Handling DOM Nodes
-
Updates from the 95th TC39 meeting
No, probably not. But with iterator helpers, you can do
-
All JavaScript and TypeScript features of the last 3 years explained
> focus more on improving the terrible JS web API
That's W3C’s job, not ECMA’s.
> Where are all the containers?
?
> Sorted sets/maps?
Sets and Maps are sorted (by insertion order)
> Why can't I even map an iterator?
It's coming, but someone will likely be exhausted by that addition. https://github.com/tc39/proposal-iterator-helpers
-
Uncle Bob and Casey Muratori Discuss Clean Code
Upcoming: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-iterator-helpers
-
[AskJS] Is JavaScript missing some built-in methods?
Not Generators, but Iterators have a Stage 3 proposal with helpers like these.
-
Just fighting URLSearchParams and wonder if anyone uses iterators IRL and what I do miss
I guess you are not the only one dealing with this. That’s why there is this proposal https://github.com/tc39/proposal-iterator-helpers So hopefully it will get easier soon. But in most cases you can simply wrap it in Array.from or you can also clone with the spread operator.
-
Iterator/Generator Exercises?
Let's assume Number.range(), iterator helpers and some isPrime() function. From that we could easily create the following:
What are some alternatives?
native-messaging-bash - Bash Native Messaging host.
proposal-function-helpers - A withdrawn proposal for standardizing some useful, popular helper functions into JavaScript’s Function object.
captureSystemAudio - Capture system audio ("What-U-Hear")
IxJS - The Interactive Extensions for JavaScript
proposal-pipeline-operator - A proposal for adding a useful pipe operator to JavaScript.
proposal-hack-pipes - Draft specification for Hack pipes in JavaScript.
proposal-upsert - ECMAScript Proposal, specs, and reference implementation for Map.prototype.upsert
proposal-hack-pipes - Draft specification for Hack pipes in JavaScript. [Moved to: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-hack-pipes]
caya - a tiny useful simple language experiment
EventSource - a polyfill for http://www.w3.org/TR/eventsource/
coffeescript - Unfancy JavaScript
mpr.kirke.dev