proposal-bind-operator
proposal-partial-application
proposal-bind-operator | proposal-partial-application | |
---|---|---|
8 | 8 | |
1,738 | 1,012 | |
0.2% | 0.0% | |
0.0 | 0.0 | |
over 6 years ago | almost 2 years ago | |
HTML | ||
- | BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
proposal-bind-operator
-
Pipe Operator (|>) For JavaScript
There was also a different proposal that allows objects to be extended: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-bind-operator
Personally, I don't use classes much, but sometimes I think free functions a little bit hard to find, so I tend to experiment with the following pattern.
interface User { … }
const User = {
- Why Would Anyone Need JavaScript Generator Functions?
-
JavaScript Evolutsiyasi Qisqa Satrlarda!
Yangi bind operatori Function.prototype.bind ni yanada elegant tarzda ishlatish imkonini beruvchi yangi sintaksis
-
JavaScript tutorials
In modern JS, you can export each function directly without putting them in an object. It also allows you to call a function with a specific “this” value, function.bind(object)(args). As a matter of fact, there’s a syntax proposal proposal and to do exactly this, object::function(args). This proposal could make what you describe pretty popular.
-
Can't wrap my head around a thing about modules
Hey, not yet ;)
-
10+ Interesting ECMAScript Proposals
This binding syntax (::)
-
I've used the pipe() function 2,560 times and I can tell you it's good!
You'd need 4 periods.
-
[AskJS] Sensible Prototype Extensions?
I don't think you want realms so much as protocols or extensions, the latter assimilating the beloved bind operator.
proposal-partial-application
-
Explicit Software Design. Preliminary Conclusions
For true™ functional programming in JS, native pattern matching and partial function application are missing (at least for now: 1, 2). For proper OOP, it lacks real interfaces and compile-time dependency injection.
- Updates from the 96th TC39 meeting
- [AskJS] Is JavaScript missing some built-in methods?
- Currying in JavaScript
- TC39 Pipeline Operator – Hack vs. F#
-
GitHub - tc39/proposal-pipeline-operator: A proposal for adding the simple-but-useful pipeline operator to JavaScript.
pipes, pattern matching, partial application, records & tuples 😍
-
10+ Interesting ECMAScript Proposals
Partial Application Operator: ?
-
Other languages with partial application à la Mathematica?
There is a proposal for JavaScript: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-partial-application
What are some alternatives?
proposal-generator-arrow-functions - ECMAScript proposal: Generator Arrow Functions
proposal-pipeline-operator - A proposal for adding a useful pipe operator to JavaScript.
proposal-relative-indexing-method - A TC39 proposal to add an .at() method to all the basic indexable classes (Array, String, TypedArray)
factor - Factor programming language
proposal-observable - Observables for ECMAScript
proposal-temporal - Provides standard objects and functions for working with dates and times.
proposal-object-freeze-seal-syntax - A JavaScript TC39 proposal for Object.freeze & Object.seal syntax
proposal-as-patterns - `as` destructuring patterns
proposal-json-modules - Proposal to import JSON files as modules