production VS TextSecure

A question related to this has to do with the fact that d.tube unpins a video that did not receive at least 10 dollar cents in 7 days or it lacks frequent upvotes. If in this case d.tube unpins the video and its thumbnail does that mean that the title still exists or all traces are erased? If so if another node still has the video pinned will it then still be visible on d.tube? regardless of them having unpinned the video and thumbnail ?

Link Explaining it on D Tube’s website

https://d.tube/#!/c/username

In 2008 there was a huge international controversy when an old 1992 video clip from Paul de Leeuw's own TV show was posted on Youtube. This video has since then been meticulously removed from Youtube and other major platforms – even from Bitchute. But, there is still one platform where the 4,5 min. clip still remains: https://d.tube/#!/v/transformati22/QmdU1ukJ5rq4BghtQ8Kkiqz4VugTabCvXgMokC12Aa5PnL. If you are for some reason not outraged enough at the beginning of the video then watch the last 20 seconds…!

Here is bluehost review go : bluehost review

https://d.tube/#!/v/tibfox/QmbFGwSgTEsANojmwd5UjD8tz4nydkP5aeE7AS31ZpMhDg

I just signed up for a d.tube account yesterday and made sure that I copied everything exactly into a credentials text file. Not only was I unable to link my FB account during the signup process, I also never received the SMS code to link my phone number.

So, probably not the most ideal alternative if those are dealbreakers for you. 😊 You can check out there Wiki here for more info. 😊

What about d.tube?

Moxie's reasons for disallowing Signal distribution via F-droid always rang a little flat to me ( https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-Android/issues/127 ). Lots of chatter about the supposedly superior security model of Google Play Store, and as a result fewer eyes independently building and testing the Signal code base. Everyone is entitled to their opinions, but independent and reproducible builds seem like a net positive for everyone. Always struggled to understand releasing code as open source without taking advantage of the community's willingness to build and test. Looking at it in a new light after the XZ backdoor, and Jia Tan's interactions with other FOSS folk.

Signal has documentation on how to reproduce their Play Store builds and compare them with what you've installed locally:

https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-Android/blob/main/reprod...

There's nothing on Signal blog as of yet, but Signal's git repository was tagged with v7.0.0 yesterday and we can see from the commit history since the previously tagged version (v6.74.4) that there will be a setting to hide one's phone number [1], as well as disabling the previous default behavior of advertising that one is on Signal to all their contacts already using it [2].

[1] https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-Android/commit/8797236b5... (PNP stands for "Phone Number Privacy")

[2] https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-Android/commit/6097e6c30...

Signal works the same but without the user tracking from Meta/Facebook. Many people use it as well but I'm surprised that a majority sticks to WhatsApp.

Telegram and Signal solve this.

Sadly yes: Looks like an open issue 13290 for Signal, sounds like they were/are indeed still interacting through google's push notification service, wat, and per a link at that issue it was a chore for Tutanota to break away once they realised it was a problem some years ago (though at least they thought about it years ago? wtf Signal...)

Here is one: https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-Android/tree/main/reprod...

Rule 1: Posts to r/signal must relate to Signal.