play.tailwindcss.com VS Tailwind CSS

Another tip is to use https://play.tailwindcss.com/

I have not dealt with something like this before. However, you do not need to use a custom CSS equivalent. You can try out your utility classes here https://play.tailwindcss.com/ and see if you're getting the same results. If you're trying to give the div content more emphasis using the drop-shadow utility class, try drop-shadow-xl to make it stand out a bit more. Around the focus property, you mentioned perhaps using one of the conditional modifiers such as focus:drop-shadow-md may help. I have some lessons around tailwind you may want to watch https://youtu.be/R0E2qSXcmAY Good luck.

Are you looking for a CDN (to let you use Tailwind in an arbitrary environment where you can't install it) or simply a playground? For a playground the easiest is the official one https://play.tailwindcss.com/

Let's go to the Tailwind Play website and try it there. Remove all the code in the editor section so that we get a blank screen.

I'm a beginner and I don't know why tailwind behaves differently when used with svelte. I type this code on tailwind playground.

Here you don't need to sign up. https://tailwindcss.com/ Try the cdn or better yet https://play.tailwindcss.com/ if you want to try it out.

If you want to try Tailwind CSS, Tailwind Play and Play CDN are the quickest way you can get your hands dirty

Were going to use the Tailwind CSS Play tool. This will get us up and going fast and make sure youre environment is identical to mine.

I've been using Tailwind for a few months and I've been speeding up my development time so much by taking advantage of how easily I can take a Figma design from a competent designer and convert it over to html/CSS with https://play.tailwindcss.com.

If you're not familiar with Tailwind css, read the docs and follow step by step. If you were sent components, it's probably not the full site structure so that's why they don't look good. You could create a new Tailwind project and copy each code snippet/section and they will display correctly. You can also use: https://play.tailwindcss.com/ as your sandbox to test those components individually.

You can use any frontend framework you want — react-based tooling, however, has a natural advantage as it models everything as a function of state, which can map 1:1 with the concept in Burr. In the demo app we use react, react-query, and tailwind, but we’ll be skipping over this largely (it is not central to the purpose of the post).

Tailwind CSS: A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom designs.

First, you need to make sure that you have a working Tailwind CSS project…

Tailwind CSS

With better CSS approaches like TailwindCSS and Vanilla Extract (which we're heavily using) it's much easier to maintain the UI and make sure it doesn't change unexpectedly. No more conflicting CSS classes, much less CSS specificity issues and much less CSS code in general.

This app was built with Svelte Kit, Tailwind CSS, and many other technologies. For a full rundown, please visit the GitHub repository

Unlike Tailwind, which has over 77,000 stars on GitHub, Mojo CSS has about 200 stars on GitHub. But the Mojo CSS documentation is fairly good and you can find most of the information you’ll need there.

JavaScript React Flowbite Tailwind Firebase - Auth, Database, and Hosting Vite

- Performance is a feature.

Another common interpretation of brutalism is aesthetic, reacting to overly complicated user interfaces by creating simpler, more direct ones. Tailwind CSS (https://tailwindcss.com), one of today's most popular CSS libraries, promotes this approach in its component examples. There's also a neat library I've seen recently called "Neobrutalism Components" for React that I like (https://neobrutalism-components.vercel.app), providing components with a similar look and feel to Gumroad. This might more accurately be called 'Neo-Brutalism,' as noted in the comments.

A more engineering-centric interpretation of Brutalism focuses on form, structure, and efficiency, drawing significantly from brutalist architecture principles. Apart from the user interface itself, most mobile, desktop, and web applications are extremely bloated and often perform worse than sites from 10 years ago did. While one HTML file might be "less brutalist" than the original HN site, it is substantially more brutalist than any HN mobile app in existence, and offers nearly identical functionality.

A broader interpretation of brutalism, which could be termed 'Meta-Brutalism,' is embodied in the overall experience on this site through UX flows. Yes, in the strictest sense, the original HN site is more Brutalist in many ways, but it only shows 30 articles at a time and does not function as a PWA. For this site, the experience of reading 10 stories is arguably less brutalist, but for quickly browsing through several pages and skimming articles (which is how I read HN) it is a lot faster, and in my opinion, more Brutalist.

My primary inspiration was addressing software and tool bloat in UIs rather than strictly adhering to every principle set forth by David Bryant Copeland. I don't find it convincing that this site "isn't brutalist" compared to really any other experience apart from the Main HN site, and I would argue the overall experience is more brutalist in its performance and scrolling behavior.

As a side note: I generally don't like Brutalist architecture that much although I believe it is unfairly maligned. I visited the Salk Institute once and enjoyed it though (https://www.archdaily.com/61288/ad-classics-salk-institute-l...).

- Staff Software Engineer ($275k/yr): https://tailwindcss.com/careers/staff-software-engineer

We're small, independent, and profitable, with a team of just 6 people doing millions in revenue, and growing sustainably every year. You'd work directly with the founders on open-source software used by millions of people.

If you like the idea of working on a small team that cares about craft and isn't trying to achieve VC scale, I think this is a pretty awesome place to do your best work.