stun VS opus

Compare stun vs opus and see what are their differences.

InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
stun opus
3 6
578 374
5.0% 1.6%
6.8 5.9
29 days ago about 2 months ago
Go Go
MIT License MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

stun

Posts with mentions or reviews of stun. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-11-29.
  • NAT behaviour discovery using STUN
    1 project | news.ycombinator.com | 29 Nov 2022
  • WebTorrent
    14 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 29 Nov 2022
    This isn't true.

    In 2017 appear.in published some numbers. They saw ~15% were not able to do P2P. https://medium.com/@fippo/what-kind-of-turn-server-is-being-...

    Reading your stackoverflow link my guess is that you aren't using STUN. A P2P connection can't be established without a NAT hole punch.

    Also if possible I would avoid the terms `Full-cone NAT` and `Symmetric NAT` they don't do a good job of describing what is actually happening. NAT Mapping/NAT Filtering is the best way to describe it. I wrote a little bit about it here [0]. To see what type of NAT you have try stun-nat-behaviour[1]

    [0] https://webrtcforthecurious.com/docs/03-connecting/#nat-mapp...

    [1] https://github.com/pion/stun/tree/master/cmd/stun-nat-behavi...

  • How to make communicating two machines which are behind their respective NATs with wireguard
    1 project | /r/WireGuard | 26 Sep 2022
    If you test your NAT on the destination via a tool like https://github.com/pion/stun/tree/master/cmd/stun-nat-behaviour, what does it report for mapping and filtering?

opus

Posts with mentions or reviews of opus. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-08-21.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing stun and opus you can also consider the following projects:

webrtc-echoes - Simple useful interoperability tests for WebRTC libraries. If you are a WebRTC library developer we'd love to include you!

cats - Implementations of cat(1) from various sources.

aquatic - High-performance open BitTorrent tracker (UDP, HTTP, WebTorrent)

wtf - WTF Dial is an example web application written in Go.

buffer - The buffer module from node.js, for the browser.

Pion WebRTC - Pure Go implementation of the WebRTC API

simple-peer - 📡 Simple WebRTC video, voice, and data channels

turn - Pion TURN, an API for building TURN clients and servers

werift-webrtc - WebRTC Implementation for TypeScript (Node.js), includes ICE/DTLS/SCTP/RTP/SRTP/WEBM/MP4

dtls - DTLS 1.2 Server/Client implementation for Go

trystero - ✨🤝✨ Build instant multiplayer webapps, no server required — Magic WebRTC matchmaking over BitTorrent, Nostr, MQTT, IPFS, and Firebase

upspin - Upspin: A framework for naming everyone's everything.