pimacs VS vscode-mail

Compare pimacs vs vscode-mail and see what are their differences.

pimacs

A partial, experimental implementation of an Elisp interpreter written in Go (by federicotdn)

vscode-mail

A Mail client embedded in Visual Studio Code. (by buhe)
InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
pimacs vscode-mail
3 1
25 27
- -
8.7 1.1
3 months ago about 1 year ago
Go TypeScript
GNU General Public License v3.0 only GNU General Public License v3.0 only
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

pimacs

Posts with mentions or reviews of pimacs. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-02-16.

vscode-mail

Posts with mentions or reviews of vscode-mail. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-02-16.
  • The Emacsen family, the design of an Emacs and the importance of Lisp (2023)
    6 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 16 Feb 2024
    > It's not a weird gotcha when dismissing the tool. If you want to artificially narrow the comparison to "writing SW" (which is even narrower than text editing), then by all means - VSCode is the superior tool. But why stop there?

    One, I wouldn't have conceded the crown to VSCode so easily as that. A fine-tuned Emacs config, with the requisite muscle memory and custom elisp, is a hot rod. I do use VSCode, and before that Sublime, but it was under protest, the details don't matter here but there were features I needed and no task budget for provisioning them in Emacs.

    Second, why not stop there? I have a program for reading my email, it isn't VSCode, I'm fine with that. So telling me Emacs can read email is completely irrelevant to my use of VSCode. For most people, adding all of these features to the Emacs side of the balance backfires, because now Emacs has to be better than all the tools they use for that stuff, rather than just better at what VSCode does than VSCode is.

    "Emacs does everything" is an aesthetic, and it has many decades of refinement, and people like it. That's fine.

    > Most people don't need or want all the UNIX tools' capabilities. Does it make sense to compare the Windows command environment with the Linux one and say "Don't include all these capabilities in the analysis?"

    This isn't at all what you're doing. It's more like if someone says "awk is fine for text munging, why would I use Perl" and your answer was that Perl has a web server.

    There's such a thing as a like-for-like comparison. Emacs has org-mode, it has SLIME, it has paredit and parinfer. Those are all edges over VSCode, whereas checking email isn't. This conversation piqued my curiousity, and indeed, there's a plugin for that[0], a few actually, and yes, I'm sure Emacs does a better job, for some value of better. But I'll never know, because I don't intend to use either tool for that job.

    [0]: https://github.com/buhe/vscode-mail

What are some alternatives?

When comparing pimacs and vscode-mail you can also consider the following projects:

lem - Common Lisp editor/IDE with high expansibility